A police dog that was injured during violent disorder in Southport has been retired from service.
The animal, named Zoe, required stitches after she suffered a laceration to her leg during disorder involving hundreds of people on July 30.
Mersey Police Dogs said Zoe was now “fit and well”, but added that it would “never ask our dogs to do something they no longer want to do”.
The violent unrest in Southport came a day after three girls were killed in a knife attack in the town, with more than 50 police officers injured during the disorder.
On Friday evening, Mersey Police Dogs posted on its X account: “We are sad to announce that following the violent disorder in Southport, PD (Police Dog) Zoe is to retire from service.
“Zoe is fit and well but we will never ask our dogs to do something they no longer want to do.
“Thank you for your bravery and service, we wish you all the happiness in retirement.”
Following the disorder, Merseyside Police said a dog named Ike was “recovering after sustaining a cut mouth and swelling to his front leg” and another, named Quga, had “suffered burns to her back leg”.
A fourth police dog, named Repo, was spared injury after its handler kicked petrol away.
Mersey Police Dogs said it had “no words for how our officers and dogs were targeted” during the disorder, adding “our police dogs demonstrated extreme bravery and did all they could to assist colleagues under a sustained and violent attack”.
In an update on September 3, the dogs section said Quga had “finally been reunited with her handler after a slow recovery”.
In a post on social media, Mersey Police Dogs added: “Following a trip to the vets she has been given the all clear and will hopefully be back fighting crime and hunting down criminals soon.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article