A strong wave was likely responsible for the capsizing of a Viking ship replica earlier this week off Norway’s coast that killed a US citizen, police have said.
Officers described it as a “tragic accident” that did not constitute a criminal matter.
The wooden replica, called Naddodd, was crossing the North Atlantic from the Faeroe Islands to Norway with an international team of six people.
![The Viking ship replica moored at the quay in Maloy after capsizing earlier this week off Norway’s coast](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/2024/08/29/1e8822d842404acab7b7d0537ee16507.jpg?w=640)
The 10-metre (33-feet) double-masted vessel built on the Faeroes had departed the islands located halfway between Scotland and Iceland on Saturday.
On Tuesday, it sailed into strong winds and high waves and late that night, the ship capsized off the coastal town of Stad, about 346 kilometres (215 miles) from the capital of Oslo.
Survivors told police that the weather “suddenly turned significantly worse than predicted with very high waves”.
Rescuers said some of the waves were up to five metres (16 feet) high at the time.
The five survivors had managed to get into an inflatable life raft and were were later airlifted to safety by helicopter.
A sixth person, who had been trapped underneath the vessel, drowned, police said.
The victim’s body was found on Wednesday.
Police have not released the name of the victim but Norwegian and Faeroese media identified her as 29-year-old archaeologist Karla Dana, from Florida.
“Thrilled to be a part of this crew, fearlessly embarking on this Nordic voyage on a Viking ship replica across the North Sea, pushing through physical and mental limits to sail into history,” Ms Dana had posted on her LinkedIn profile before the trip.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here