UK supermarkets are not likely to be misleading shoppers over loyalty pricing – but questions remain over whether displayed savings are genuine, the competition watchdog has suggested.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it was in the process of analysing thousands of loyalty price promotions among grocers.
They form part of loyalty schemes, whereby customers can sign up to access lower prices, personalised rewards and offers, and loyalty points.
Tesco Clubcard, Sainsbury’s Nectar, Morrisons More and Lidl Plus are among the major membership schemes.
The CMA was looking into whether non-member, or regular, prices may have been artificially inflated by supermarkets to make their loyalty price appear more attractive.
It said it was still undertaking analysis, but that “the results to date suggest we are unlikely to identify widespread evidence of loyalty promotions that mislead shoppers in this way”.
It suggests major supermarkets could avoid the wrath of the regulator when it publishes a full report of its findings in November.
Nevertheless, the CMA said it was looking deeper into the issue of retailers alternating between loyalty prices and “was” and “now” discounts.
The practice raises questions as to what the regular price is for a product and therefore whether shoppers are genuinely making the savings advertised to them, the regulator said.
It is also examining whether shoppers trust that savings are genuine, and how much people shop around and compare prices.
Helen Dickinson, chief executive of trade group the British Retail Consortium, said it welcomes the CMA’s update suggesting it has not found “widespread evidence of misleading loyalty promotions”.
“Whether it’s everyday value, or loyalty schemes discounts, retailers know they have to demonstrate clear value to attract and retain customers,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here