The US government has officially ended its legal fight against an upcoming expedition to the Titanic shipwreck after the company that owns the ship’s salvage rights scaled back its dive plans.
But the US said in court filings last week that it may wage court battles over future expeditions if they break a federal law and an agreement with Great Britain to treat the wreck as a grave site.
The litigation began last year after RMS Titanic Inc announced the expedition, which is now scheduled for mid-July.
The Georgia-based company originally planned to take images inside the ocean liner’s severed hull and to retrieve artefacts from the debris field.
![TITAN ANNIVERSARY](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/1996/09/02/f840e67ae33f4200a15abaaa85979ce4.jpg?w=640)
RMST also said it would possibly recover free-standing objects inside the Titanic, including from the room where the sinking ship broadcast its distress signals.
The US filed its legal challenge in August, arguing that entering the Titanic — or physically altering or disturbing the wreck — is regulated by the 2017 federal law and pact with Britain.
Both regard the site as a memorial to the more than 1,500 people who died when the Titanic struck an iceberg and sank in 1912.
Among the government’s concerns is the possible disturbance of artefacts and any human remains that may still exist on the North Atlantic seabed.
In October, RMST said it had significantly pared down its dive plans. That is because its director of underwater research, Paul-Henri Nargeolet, died in the implosion of the Titan submersible near the Titanic shipwreck in June.
![TITAN ANNIVERSARY](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/AP/2023/06/28/34754493a03d403ca886c485275cb9b7.jpg?w=640)
The Titan was operated by a separate company, OceanGate, to which Mr Nargeolet was lending expertise. Mr Nargeolet was supposed to lead this year’s RMST expedition.
RMST stated in a February court filing that it will send an uncrewed submersible to the site and only take external images.
“The company will not come into contact with the wreck,” RMST stated, adding that it “will not attempt any artefact recovery or penetration imaging”.
The US government stated in a June 27 court filing that it is ending its legal efforts against the expedition because of the company’s revised dive plans.
But the government said future expeditions could be illegal. It noted that the firm’s longer-term objectives still involve the possible retrieval of objects from inside the wreck and surrounding debris field.
For that reason, the US said it wants to leave the door open for future legal battles. Specifically, the government said it may still pursue last year’s motion to intervene as a party in RMST’s salvage case with a federal admiralty court.
RMST has been the court-recognised steward of the Titanic’s artefacts since 1994. Its last expedition was in 2010, before the federal law and international agreement took effect.
The company has recovered and conserved thousands of Titanic artefacts, from silverware to a piece of the ship’s hull, which millions of people have seen through its exhibits.
US District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith is the maritime jurist who presides over Titanic salvage matters in Norfolk, Virginia. She said during a March court hearing that the US government’s case against RMST would raise serious legal questions if it continues, while the consequences could be wide-ranging.
Congress is allowed to modify maritime law, Ms Smith said in reference to the US regulating entry into the sunken Titanic. But the judge questioned whether Congress can strip courts of their own admiralty jurisdiction over a shipwreck, something that has centuries of legal precedent.
In 2020, Ms Smith gave RMST permission to retrieve and exhibit the radio that had broadcast the Titanic’s distress calls. The US government responded by filing an official legal challenge against the expedition.
The court battle never played out. RMST indefinitely delayed those plans because of the coronavirus pandemic.
Ms Smith noted in March that time may be running out for expeditions inside the Titanic. The ship is rapidly deteriorating.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel