President Joe Biden nudged further ahead in the Democratic nomination for re-election by winning the party caucuses in Wyoming and is the only choice on the ballot later in Alaska.
As two of the least populated states, Alaska and Wyoming play minuscule roles in both intra-party and general election voting in presidential election years.
Mr Biden effectively clinched the Democratic nomination on March 12 with the Georgia primary and is now all but certain to face former president Donald Trump as the Republican nominee in November.
Alaska Democrats are holding a voice vote for their party-run preference poll at in-person and virtual district meetings.
Mr Biden is the lone candidate eligible to receive votes after the other Democrat to qualify, Dean Phillips, suspended his campaign last month. The vote is being held during meetings where other party business is conducted.
The polling was delayed a week. Democrats had planned a ranked vote election by mail on April 6 but those plans changed when only Mr Biden and Mr Phillips qualified for the ballot, and when Mr Phillips suspended his run.
Changes to their plan were approved by the Democratic National Committee.
There were no provisions for write-ins or uncommitted, said Lindsay Kavanaugh, the Alaska party’s executive director.
“There is no option to vote nay,” she said. “You can abstain. You don’t vote yes or no, you vote for a candidate.”
The party proceeded with a vote, even with just one candidate, “to make sure we’re as inclusive as possible”, she said, and to avoid any inference that party leaders were deciding candidates themselves.
Alaska will allocate 15 pledged delegates based on the vote.
Meanwhile, Mr Biden won in Wyoming, where polling determined which candidate got the state’s 17 national delegates.
The caucuses also decided who goes to the state Democratic convention on June 1 in Casper. There, 13 of Wyoming’s national convention delegates will be chosen.
Wyoming’s other four “automatic” national delegates are the state party chairman, vice chair and two national committee people, who have not yet pledged for Mr Biden or anyone else.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here