One of the companies behind the controversial Cambo and Rosebank oil fields is eyeing a deal with Italy’s Eni which could see the oil major take a nearly 40% stake in it.
Ithaca Energy said the deal, which would also see it take over Eni’s UK operations, would make it the second largest independent operator in the UK.
The agreement would see Ithaca gain assets that produce around 40,000 to 45,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day from Eni. In return Eni would get a 38%-39% stake in Ithaca.
That would push Ithaca’s overall production to more than 100,000 barrels per day, making it the second biggest player in the country with stakes in six of the UK continental shelf’s 10 biggest oil and gas fields.
Ithaca and Eni have reached an exclusivity agreement, which means the two parties now have a month to see if they want to go ahead.
“Eni has granted Ithaca Energy exclusivity in respect of the assets, the subject of the potential combination, for a period of four weeks from the date of this announcement,” Ithaca said.
Ithaca owns a majority of the Cambo site, and bought a 20% stake in Rosebank in 2022.
Last September it took the final decision alongside Norway’s Equinor to invest 3.8 billion US dollars (£3 billion) to develop Rosebank. It has not yet taken a final decision over Cambo.
The decision to go ahead with Rosebank has proved controversial, with opponents pointing towards the International Energy Agency’s roadmap for the world to reach its climate ambitions.
This, the IEA said, would require that no new oil and gas projects are approved.
Critics say Rosebank can produce around 500 million barrels of oil, which one Conservative MP likened to running 56 coal-fired power plants for a whole year.
Ithaca said on Wednesday that it produced 70,200 barrels of oil equivalent per day last year. Around a third of that was gas and two-thirds liquids.
It said production will fall to between 56,000 and 61,000 in 2024, in part because it is delaying investment due to the windfall tax on oil and gas companies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here