Veteran MSP and former Scottish Government minister Fergus Ewing has branded the SNP an “authoritarian party” that demands “obedience to the leadership” as he revealed a suspension imposed upon him has been upheld by party bosses.
SNP MSPs at Holyrood had agreed to suspend the Inverness and Nairn MSP from their group for a week back in September 2023 after he voted against a Scottish Government minister in a crucial vote of confidence.
Mr Ewing, the son of late SNP trailblazer Winnie Ewing and a former rural economy secretary in the Scottish Government, had appealed against that decision.
But in a statement released by his office on Tuesday evening he said it had been upheld by the party who he then turned his fire on.
Claiming his vote against the circular economy minister and Scottish Green co-leader Lorna Slater had been a “vote of conscience”, Mr Ewing hit out, saying: “The SNP has now become an authoritarian party requiring strict obedience to the leadership at the expense of personal freedom for any individual member.”
He insisted that the public “do not want MSPs to be mere ciphers or rubber stamps of leadership dictation”, with Mr Ewing claiming: “If my constituents wanted a doormat, they would have gone to B&Q.”
His comments came after the veteran politician, who has been an MSP since the first Holyrood elections in 1999, spoke out against the Scottish Government on policies such as the now halted deposit return scheme (DRS), and the introduction of new regulations for short-term property lets.
![](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/2024/02/27185209/d63b835d-4a04-4769-a94b-dbd98b43784b.jpg)
It was after DRS was put on hold that a vote on no confidence in Ms Slater was called, with Mr Ewing saying he had “stood up for my constituents to protect them against a disastrous policy (the Deposit Return Scheme) and voted with my conscience against that policy, which was eventually discarded”.
But he insisted: “The SNP leadership no longer tolerates a conscience vote.”
The party’s leadership brought in new rules in 2021, preventing SNP MSPs from using a conscience vote or constituency grounds to go against the Scottish Government, Mr Ewing claimed, adding the party had never before exerted such control over its members at Holyrood.
Refusing to say if he would re-join the party, he repeated his call for SNP leader and Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf to put the power sharing agreement with Greens at Holyrood to a fresh vote.
This Bute House Agreement gives the SNP a majority in the Scottish Parliament, but Mr Ewing, who has previously branded the Greens as being “wine bar pseudo-intellectuals”, insisted it was a “disastrous deal”.
![](http://content.assets.pressassociation.io/2024/02/27185211/c8b59b4e-7650-49b8-8518-cba14c20fddd.jpg)
He told how he had “served” the SNP for 50 years as it was “the main vehicle for independence”, but added: “Over the past two years, we have borne the high electoral cost of a disastrous deal with the Greens.
“It is dragging us down.
“I suspect that, were it put to a vote, the party members may call a halt to it before even more electoral harm is caused.
“I therefore again call upon Humza to put this to the vote.
“After all, that’s democracy, not authoritarianism.”
The Inverness and Nairn MSP meanwhile pledged he would “continue to defend” his constituents, but refused to say if he would re-join the SNP.
He stated: “For my future, I vow to continue to defend the interests of my constituents, and as far as the SNP is concerned… let the cards fall as they may.
“If the SNP cannot cope with that, so be it.”
The SNP has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here