Industrial fishing for sandeels could soon be banned under new Government proposals, offering some of the UK’s best-known bird species a “lifeline”.
Sandeels are small, eel-like fish that are an important source of food for threatened birds such as puffins and kittiwakes.
While warming seas are reducing the sandeel population, industrial fishing adds extra pressure and reduces the amount available for the birds during the breeding season.
Kittiwake numbers have fallen by half since the 1960s while the traditionally strong colony of puffins on the Farne Islands off the Northumberland coast is in decline.
Both species are on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species.
A report from NatureScot in 2021 found that Arctic skuas had declined by 81% since the 1980s, with sandeel fishing being a factor.
The Government said that without effective management, sandeel fishing in the North Sea poses a risk to the breeding success of UK seabirds.
A full ban on fishing could increase the seabirds’ abundance within 10 years, according to experts at Natural England, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science.
Melissa Moore, head of policy at Oceana UK, said a ban on sandeel fishing is “much needed” and that industrial fishing for all species should be banned in Marine Protected Areas.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has launched a consultation on introducing restrictions on sandeel fishing in English waters.
Environment Secretary Therese Coffey said: “Britain’s seabirds are beautiful to observe and a treasured part of our coastal environment and their existence and ways of life are crucial to the wider health of our marine ecosystems.
“This consultation is an important step in securing their protection and delivering our commitment in the Environment Improvement Plan to halt the decline of nature and allow wildlife to thrive”.
The Government hopes to build on the three Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs) it designated at the end of February by running the consultation, which will last for 12 weeks until May 30.
The HPMAs will come into effect by July and will ban activities such as fishing, construction and dredging.
Environmental groups have urged the Government to massively extend HPMAs saying they cover only 0.5% of English waters.
The UK was part of the UN agreement in December which set a target to protect 30% of the world’s seas by 2030.
Katie-jo Luxton, director for conservation at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, said of the consultation: “This is huge news for the UK’s efforts to save our iconic seabirds.
“Decades of increasing ‘human-induced’ pressures in our busy seas have left our seabirds in a precarious state, and a ban on industrial trawling for sandeels would throw our most threatened seabirds a lifeline in the face of mounting pressures in our seas.
“This is a crucial moment; after last year’s devastating outbreak of highly pathogenic avian flu and with major new offshore energy developments planned, there is an urgent need to build the resilience of our seabird colonies as well as helping to rebuild the overall health of the North Sea for all marine wildlife.”
The consultation announcement comes almost a week before the screening of a new series narrated by Sir David Attenborough, Wild Isles, which highlights some of the UK’s natural living wonders.
Kate Norgrove, executive director of advocacy and campaigns for World Wide Fund for Nature said: “The UK is home to some of the most spectacular species on earth and our seas some of the richest in Europe.
“But we are pushing nature to the brink, and as a result, it urgently needs our protection and restoration.
“If we are to help stabilise our climate, our economy and leave a planet fit for the next generation, we need to see many more measures to tackle the systemic challenges that continue to push nature to the brink.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here