Scientists have released one of the most precise measurements ever made of how matter is distributed across the universe today.
When the universe began, matter was flung outwards, gradually forming the planets, stars and galaxies.
By carefully putting together a map of that matter today, scientists can try to understand the forces that shaped the evolution of the universe.
Combining data from two major telescope surveys of the universe, the Dark Energy Survey and the South Pole Telescope, the new analysis involved more than 150 researchers, including several with the University of Chicago and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
The research suggests matter is not as “clumpy” as would be expected based on the current best model of the universe.
According to the scientists, this adds to a body of evidence that there may be something missing from the existing standard model of the universe.
By analysing the two sets of data, the scientists could infer where all the matter ended up in the universe.
They say it is more precise than previous measurements as it narrows down the possibilities for where this matter wound up, compared with previous analyses.
The majority of the results fit perfectly with the currently accepted best theory of the universe.
But there are also signs of a crack – one that has been suggested in the past.
Co-author and University of Hawaii astrophysicist Eric Baxter, said: “It seems like there are slightly less fluctuations in the current universe than we would predict assuming our standard cosmological model anchored to the early universe.”
The new readings find the universe is less clumpy, clustering in certain areas rather than evenly spread out.
The researchers say that if other studies continue to find the same results, it may mean there is something missing from the existing model of the universe.
However, the results are not yet to the statistical level that scientists consider to be certain.
But because the analysis yielded useful information from two very different telescope surveys the results are considered to be landmark findings.
The findings are published as a set of three articles in Physical Review D.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here