Controversial figure Tony Abbott has been appointed to the Board of Trade, despite critics arguing the former Australian prime minister was not suitable to be a Government adviser.
Critics raised numerous concerns over allegations against the 62-year-old, including his climate change scepticism and belief that coronavirus restrictions should be lifted.
The move seemed to cause splits even among fellow board appointees.
Anne Boden, founder of the online-only bank Starling, tweeted to say she was “pleased to be advising the Board of Trade” and said it was “important that we have challenging voices” speaking to ministers.
But the financial-technology expert added that she supported diversity and “so did this woman”, linking to a 2012 speech by another former Australian prime minister, Julia Gillard, in which she accused Mr Abbott of being a misogynist in the country’s equivalent of the House of Commons.
Wales-born Ms Gillard quoted the then-leader of the opposition as having asked during a discussion “What if men are by physiology or temperament more adapted to exercise authority or to issue command?”
In other comments, Mr Abbott, who led Australia for two years between 2013 and 2015, also previously said he felt “a bit threatened” by homosexuality.
But Prime Minister Boris Johnson defended him, heralding his status as a former leader of “freedom-loving” and “liberal” Australia.
The Department for International Trade formally announced on Friday that Mr Abbott will form part of the new-look Board of Trade, in what is said to be an unpaid role.
In its announcement, the department stressed that advisers to the board will have “no direct role in striking trade deals”.
The UK is currently looking to agree its own trade agreements for the first time in more than 40 years after leaving the European Union in January.
It is conducting negotiations with the US, Japan, New Zealand and Australia where Mr Abbott, an ex-leader of the Liberal Party, was prime minister for two years from 2013-15.
Trade Secretary Liz Truss said: “The new Board of Trade will play an important role in helping Britain make the case for free and fair trade across the UK and around the world.
“At a time of increased protectionism and global insecurity, it’s vital that the UK is a strong voice for open markets and that we play a meaningful role in reshaping global trading rules alongside like-minded countries.
“The new board will help us do that, bringing together a diverse group of people who share Britain’s belief in free enterprise, democracy, and high standards and rules-based trade.”
Shadow trade secretary Emily Thornberry, however, said Mr Abbott had “no credentials for this role”.
The senior Labour figure said he had a “history of offensive statements” and argued the Oxford University graduate had “no experience of detailed trade negotiations” and blamed him for “killing off Australia’s car industry”.
“Tony Abbott is therefore the wrong appointment on every level, which begs the more important question of why on earth Boris Johnson and Liz Truss have given him the job,” said Ms Thornberry.
The SNP called the decision “beyond indefensible” and said it “speaks volumes about the kind of Tory Government this is”.
But the London-born conservative figure has been defended by his sister Christine Forster.
In a statement posted on Twitter, she wrote: “It is nothing short of dishonesty for commentators and politicians who do not know Tony to label him a ‘homophobe and a misogynist’ for the purposes of scoring cheap political points.
“As a woman who has always been part of his life and who came out to him as gay in my early 40s, I know incontrovertibly that Tony is neither of those things.”
She concluded that her brother would be an “outstanding” UK trade envoy based on his track record as prime minister.
Other non-ministerial appointments to the board include former Tory MEP and Brexit campaigner Daniel Hannan and Patricia Hewitt, a former president of the Board of Trade during Tony Blair’s tenure in Downing Street.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel