Theatre
James V: Katherine
The Studio, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
Four stars
Appearances can be deceptive in the latest episode of Rona Munro’s series of history plays, which, over the last decade since the original James Plays trilogy, has begun to resemble a centuries spanning zeitgeist busting soap opera. Take episode five, brought to life in Orla O’Loughlin’s chamber sized co-production between Raw Material and Capital Theatres as a series of intimate exchanges highlighting matters of life and death before our heroines take flight en route to personal and political liberation.
The production’s young team of actors line up at the start of the play like some Trainspotting film poster homage set to a techno soundtrack on Becky Minto’s candle lined set. In fact, they are acting out some of the fallout of the execution of Protestant reformer Patrick Hamilton at the hands of Scotland’s sixteenth century religious establishment.
As the play’s subtitle hints at, it is left to Hamilton’s rebelliously inclined sister Katherine to defend his honour. So far, so historically accurate. What follows, however, takes a leap into the speculative, as Katherine spars with king and clergy like an in-yer-face Antigone before her clandestine love affair with her brother’s wife Jenny becomes the play’s emotional heart over its rapid fire seventy-five minutes.
All this is held up slightly on opening night after an audience member unfortunately takes ill. As the cast of four bounce back from where they left off with a renewed drive, they relish the rich demotic of Munro’s text. If the piousness of Benjamin Osugo’s Hamilton and terrier-like ferocity of Sean Connor as James are powerful enough, Catriona Faint’s Katherine takes full charge as she squares up to them.
It is Faint’s interplay with an equally dynamic Alyth Ross as Jenny, however, that transcends the cut and thrust of grand gestures for something more human than mere ideology in a thoroughly modern rendering of a play full of love and anger. Roll on the next exciting episode.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here