Survivors of the Manchester Arena bombing have launched legal action against a conspiracy theorist who has falsely claimed the attack was faked.
Martin Hibbert and his daughter Eve were severely injured in the terror attack at an Ariana Grande concert in 2017 that left 22 people dead including Eilidh MacLeod, 14, from the Isle of Barra.
Mr Hibbert has accused Richard D Hall of defamation and harassment after he promoted the theory that the attack never took place, and reportedly tracked them down and admitted spying on them.
The BBC reports that last Friday, they sought an injunction and damages, having initially signalled their intention to bring legal action in October 2022.
Mr Hibbert was at the concert with Eve, who was 14 at the time. They were standing about 5 metres from the bomb when it detonated and are thought to be the closest people to it to survive. Both need to use wheelchairs after sustaining serious injuries.
READ MORE: Musical legacy of young Scots piper continues on iconic route
In a statement the Hibberts’ lawyers, Hudgell Solicitors, said: “We can confirm that proceedings were issued in the high court on Friday on behalf of Martin and his daughter Eve.
“Those proceedings are for protection from harassment and misuse of private information and include an application for a restraining injunction and damages. Mr Richard Hall will shortly be served with papers and will then have an opportunity to formally respond.
“Martin is very determined to shut this individual down from harassing his family, and for peddling his outrageous slurs, lies and repugnant views that have caused continuing offence and distress.”
The BBC said Hall had admitted to its reporter that he spied on Eve Hibbert from a vehicle parked outside her home, noting that he had described online his practice of tracking down survivors of major incidents to pursue his theory that their injuries were faked.
READ MORE: Mother of Manchester Arena attack victim tells inquiry her world was "torn apart"
The broadcaster reported that, when it confronted Hall before the start of legal proceedings, he said its coverage of his activities was inaccurate and claimed to have received death threats.
Hall has not responded to a request for comment.
According to the BBC, Hudgell said his client could be “seen as a pioneering trailblazer for others to follow” for taking such action against a conspiracy theorist.
The broadcaster likened the case to that brought against the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones in the US after he falsely claimed the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax.
Hibbert told the BBC: “It does sometimes feel like a bit of a weight, so it would be nice to be able to put it to bed and just be able to move on with our lives.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here