A leading child protection expert has been appointed to decide if Scotland’s children’s services should be taken out of local authority control and managed nationally.
Professor Brigid Daniel, Professor Emerita at Queen Margaret University, will chair a group guiding independent research to determine where services fit in the forthcoming National Care Service (NCS).
The plan has drawn criticism from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla) which said their inclusion “goes far beyond the scope of the Independent Review of Adult Social Care” and there is a lack of evidence and data to justify it.
Cosla’s Children and Young People Spokesperson Councillor Stephen McCabe said that the level of restructure and reform that is proposed “risks derailing and disrupting ongoing transformation work”.
He said: “The Scottish Government’s focus in the coming years should be on ‘Keeping The Promise’ and supporting and delivering better outcomes for our children, young people and families, not on costly and time-intensive structural reform which neither demonstrates nor evidences how it would improve the lives of children and families.”
Professor Daniel said: “The research team will be guided by the overarching question: ‘How do we ensure that children, young people and families get the help they need when they need it?’
She added: “We aim to ensure services for Scotland’s children and families are informed by the best possible evidence including the perspective of those who use and deliver those services.”
The research will be carried out by the University of Strathclyde’s Centre for Excellence for Children’s Care and Protection (Celcis).
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here