More than 300,000 deaths have been attributed to Tory austerity policies that slashed billions of pounds from social security payments and public services.
Scots researchers have calculated that between 2012-2019, almost 335,000 more people died than would have been expected across the UK based on previous trends between 1981 and 2011.
The analysis, led by Glasgow Centre for Population Health and the University of Glasgow, adds to the existing evidence of a worrying stagnation of improvements in life expectancy since the early 2010s.
However, it is the first to quantify the effects of austerity policies implemented by the UK Government in 2010 on excess death rates. In Scotland, around 20,000 more deaths than expected occurred.
Without support, researchers said, "people have been dragged under by decreased income, poor housing, poor nutrition, poor health and social isolation – ultimately leading to premature death."
READ MORE: How blue spaces could play a part in making our cities safer
The researchers were trying to establish if women were more adversely affected overall and the study produced mixed results.
More than a one third of those who died were under the age of 65 and the majority (66% in Scotland) were men.
Expressed as the percentage of the total ‘observed’ deaths, the excess was 9.0% and 3.7% for males and females respectively in England & Wales, with the equivalent figures for Scotland being 4.0% and 2.6%. Changes were seen in just about every cause of death.
However, in the 20% most deprived areas, mortality rates rose to a greater degree among women.
Cuts to social security payments and eligibility, as well as services, have been shown in a number of analyses to affect women more than men.
This is said to be because women make up the majority of social security recipients in the UK while some individual social security cuts have disproportionately affected particular groups which are predominantly female including lone parents and single pensioners.
READ MORE: 'Morally indefensible': Going without food or heating now 'endemic' in Scotland
Women are also more likely to be poorer and on lower incomes due to inequalities in the labour market and in the division of caring responsibilities.
Dr David Walsh, said: "The overall message is that irrespective of gender there has been this horrific change and the additional number of deaths are about a third more than we had from Covid.
"Given what is happening at the moment with the UK Government considering more restrictions on social security it is obviously important that we learn what previous restrictions have done as the effects have been calamitous.
"Not only should we not be having further restrictions to social security but there is a need to reverse what has been done to try to protect the income and therefore the health of the poorest in society."
READ MORE: Groundbreaking dementia study finds treatment is best in person
He said there was quite a lot evidence that showed that austerity may have contributed to a rise in drug deaths in Scotland.
He said: "Although they were already going up, around about 2012 they increased massively. If you have a population with drugs issues and you take away their income, they will seek oblivion."
The study authors said comparisons of projected and observed rates are subject to a number of uncertainties, and
"thus we must be cautious in our interpretation of the precise figures".
However they said the figures were likely to be a conservative estimate of the number of excess deaths.
Co-author Prof Ruth Dundas, Professor of Social Epidemiology at the University of Glasgow said: “This study shows that in the UK a great many more deaths are likely to have been caused by UK Government economic policy than by the Covid-19 pandemic.
"We need to reverse the austerity policies and protect the income, and therefore the health, of the poorest and most vulnerable in our society.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel