More than half of Scots believe the country is “moving in the wrong direction” amid the cost-of-living crisis, according to a poll.
In a survey called Understanding Scotland, which interviewed more than 2,000 adults living north of the border in May, 47% of respondents said the cost of living was a top concern.
This proportion has more than doubled since September, corresponding with the rise in inflation.
More than half of respondents – 53% – said Scotland was “moving in the wrong direction”.
Concern over rising prices was high across the working-age population, regardless of employment status and social class.
The survey showed this concern was particularly pronounced among younger people, in households with children, and in urban areas – particularly Glasgow.
It was less of a concern among older and retired respondents.
Other key priorities for the Scottish population included healthcare and tackling poverty and inequality.
Understanding Scotland – the regular tracker of Scotland’s priorities – also found that the Covid-19 pandemic had fallen sharply in the minds of Scots, with only 4% citing it as a top concern.
Constitutional and economic debates have also fallen in importance since September, with fewer than one in five deeming them key issues.
Respondents in more deprived communities also reported concerns about housing, jobs and poverty, while those in more affluent areas were more likely to prioritise healthcare, the economy and education.
Mark Diffley, director of Diffley Partnership, which is responsible for the Understanding Scotland survey, said: “These findings point to near-universal concern over the cost-of-living crisis.
“While the public appears to have largely moved on from the pandemic, this is not giving way to any evident optimism about Scotland’s future or direction of travel.”
Andrew Wilson, founding partner of Charlotte Street Partners, which also helped conduct the survey, said the findings should create “a sense of urgency” to deal with the cost of living.
“Choices must be made now to address the concerns that this study shows are crying out for attention,” he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel