A former armed response officer awarded almost £1 million by Police Scotland over victimisation has said that no amount of compensation will “ever make up for the pain or sacrifices” she made.
Rhona Malone said she had been through an “excruciating and torturous few years”, but she hoped her experience of winning a victimisation claim against the force at an employment tribunal would “benefit many women now and in the future”.
Her comments came as she criticised not just Police Scotland, but the Scottish Police Federation, the body which represents rank and file officers.
Ms Malone claimed: “Unfortunately, both organisations failed me and grossly underestimated my determination for acknowledgment and accountability.”
Her comments came the day after it was revealed a settlement had been agreed with Police Scotland which will see her receive £947,909.07.
READ MORE: Rhona Malone wins almost £1m payout over sexism complaint
That also included a “personal apology to Ms Malone” from Chief Constable Iain Livingstone for the “serious issues highlighted in the employment tribunal judgment, including Police Scotland’s poor response when a dedicated and promising officer raised legitimate concerns”.
Ms Malone began her action against the force after a senior police officer said he did not want to see two female armed officers deployed together when there were sufficient male staff on duty.
The tribunal accepted evidence that there was an “absolute boys’ club” culture within the armed response vehicle team.
In its judgment in October last year, the employment tribunal upheld Ms Malone’s claims of victimisation. However, her claim of direct discrimination was dismissed.
In a statement issued to PA Scotland, the former police constable said it had been “quite a journey”, adding it was “sadly one that could have so easily been avoided”.
Ms Malone said her “quest for justice” had “come at great personal risk” with possible costs “in the region of six figures”.
But she said: “At long last I have closure to what has been an excruciating and torturous few years but one that I hope will benefit many women now and in the future.
“It is important for me to say that had the individuals in positions of trust and authority who victimised and suppressed my pursuit for acknowledgment and accountability been honest, shown moral integrity and empathy for my situation, then perhaps Police Scotland could have taken the opportunity to communicate and evidence a far more progressive and inclusive organisation.
“This would have empowered police officers and made Scotland proud.”
READ MORE: Tribunal finds 'sexist, boys club' culture in firearms unit
She also said that had she received “care and support from the Scottish Police Federation then perhaps Police Scotland would not have responded with contempt or attempted to suppress and deny me justice”.
Ms Malone insisted that with the “notable exception” of one person, the SPF had “failed me as a member when I most needed their assistance”.
Hitting out at the organisation, she added: “At a time when I was at my most vulnerable and reliant on their support financially and mentally, I was abandoned, ignored, and discarded.”
Ms Malone insisted her “attempts to obtain justice were obstructed because they withdrew legal support for my case in 2019” when she refused to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement and accept a “derisory financial settlement amount”.
She added: “I am still seeking accountability from organisations who negatively impacted my life, obstructed me and who I believe were complicit in the suppression of the discrimination and victimisation that I was trying to call out. This includes the Scottish Police Authority.
“These organisations had an important role to play in my case and some continue to do so, therefore it is vital that I continue to seek accountability. These processes have already started, and I hope to report on them in the near future for complete transparency.”
She also stated: “I would like it to be known that no amount of compensation would ever make up for the pain or sacrifices I made to hold Police Scotland to account, but it will enable me to continue with my quest for holding them and others answerable for their actions.”
Ms Malone said she now planned to disable her social media and “disappear for a while”, adding that while she had been “extremely vocal about the discrimination and victimisation I experienced” she felt it that now “the time is right to regain my privacy in order to heal and protect my family”.
She thanked all those who had helped her “especially my witnesses and legal team and all those who have positively impacted my case”.
Ms Malone also told her supporters: “Your kindness and generosity will never be forgotten.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel