SCRAPPING a rise in Universal Credit is ‘handing” the SNP government the argument that Westminster is hampering its efforts to eradicate child poverty, according to an equality expert.
Campaigners and prominent Tory MPs including Iain Duncan Smith, are urging the UK government to abandon plans to end the £20-a-week uplift that was introduced last year to support six million claimants during the pandemic.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation say the move will leave out-of-work families with children receiving “barely half of the income” the public believes is required to achieve a minimum standard of living.
According to a report by Loughborough University, working families on low incomes would also see this support fall sharply.
READ MORE: SNP told to speed up doubling Scottish Child Payment amid concern over Universal Credit cut
The charity argues that even for those with a full-time job on the National Living Wage, a single parent with two children aged 3 and 7 will be £66-a-week short of the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) of £482 per week.
It said working parents had been able to get closer to MIS in recent years due to increases in the National Living Wage and the £20-a-week increase to Universal Credit,
In Scotland, families are also beginning to benefit from the £20 Scottish Child Payment, with low-income parents of children under 6 already in receipt of this payment. The Scottish Government pledged during the election to double it to £20-a-week per child but with no clear timeline for implementation.
The payment has been seen as pivotal in helping the Scottish Government achieve a target that by 2023/24 fewer than 18% of children should be in relative poverty.
READ MORE: Scottish Government delay in taking up welfare powers 'regrettable', say MPs
Professor Stephen Sinclair, co-director of the Scottish Poverty and Inequality Research Unit at Glasgow Caledonian University, said: “It was anticipated it was going to have a 3% cut on child poverty and it’s just going to plateau.
“The Scottish Government will be able to say that it [the drop in Universal Credit] is one of the reasons why they won’t be able to meet their targets for child poverty in 2023, so politically, it’s handing them that argument.
“Technically the UK government will say this is not a cut, but it’s going to be experienced as a cut.
“It’s an interesting choice taken by the UK government considering the level of discussion and opposition within their own party.”
However he said, there were other options open to the Scottish Government in helping address inequalities including a rise in income tax.
The SNP’s Depute Westminster Leader and Equalities spokesperson, Kirsten Oswald MP said: ""Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak are not only threatening Scotland's recovery by imposing Tory austerity cuts on family incomes, but their actions will actively undermine anti-poverty measures implemented by the Scottish Government.
READ MORE: The basic cookery skill that all Glasgow pupils should learn to boost health
"I am urging them to U-turn on these plans, make the Universal Credit uplift permanent and extend it to legacy benefits."
A UK Government spokesman said: “The temporary Universal Credit uplift was brought in to support those with the lowest incomes during the pandemic.
“Now that restrictions are ending it is right that the Government should focus its support – through our multi-billion-pound Plan for Jobs – to help people learn new skills to progress in their career, increase their hours or find new work.”
The SNP’s Depute Westminster Leader and Equalities spokesperson, Kirsten Oswald MP said: "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel