The costs associated with buying a first home outright have surged by about two-thirds in nearly half a century, according to a think-tank.
People born in the 1980s have got the “rawest deal”, enduring rapid house price rises and tighter credit conditions, despite lower interest rates helping to ease mortgage borrowing costs, the Resolution Foundation said.
With older generations having been at the “sharp end” of high interest rates, a typical UK first-time buyer in 1974 would have paid £90,000 in net interest by the end of their mortgage, compared to £63,000 for a first-time buyer now, the research found.
Interest rates topped 10 per cent during the 1970s, 1980s and early 1990s. But while millennials – those of a mortgage to purchase their first home – two-and-a-half times as much as those in 1974, the report said.
An equivalent buyer in north east England will incur a cost of £150,000 – about 9% more than the typical first-time buyer in that region in 1974.
These variations make it potentially harder for young people today to move from one area to another, the report said.
The report, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, said a typical first-time buyer from the older baby boomer generation faced high mortgage costs in the first five years of home ownership – a time when they would have been at their most financially vulnerable with little equity in the property.
READ MORE: Scotland's tourism industry warns SNP's new Airbnb crackdown plans fall short
Some £31,000-worth of interest would have been paid on a typical 1974 purchase in those early years, compared with £17,000 on a typical born between 1980s and early 2000s – have experienced a more favourable interest rate environment, with the Bank of England base rate at a record low, they have been hit by record house prices, as well as banks and building societies’ stricter lending requirements.
Bringing the different factors together, the report found the total cost of buying a first-time property outright has increased by about two-thirds, from £154,000 back in 1974 to £254,000 now.
The vast majority of the increase happened in the years running up to the financial crisis, with the biggest jump in housing costs therefore falling on the Generation X cohort born in the early 1970s, researchers found.
In London, a typical first-time buyer now faces spending £500,000- plus over the course of the lifetime purchase today. But millennials are struggling to get on the property ladder in the first place, the foundation argued.
The average deposit required to get on the property ladder has tripled in real terms over the past 20 years, from just shy of £11,000 in 2000, to £33,000 in 2020.
While a family headed by someone born in the early 1970s, with typical income levels, would have saved enough for a first-time deposit by the age of 22, it will take a family headed by someone born in 2002 up to their 36th birthday to save enough for a deposit.
READ MORE: UK large-scale events pilot scheme reveals 'no substantial outbreaks'
Lindsay Judge, research director at the Resolution Foundation, said: “The UK property market has long been a source of intergenerational strife. Baby boomers lament the 10%-plus interest rates when they first bought, while record house prices have pulled the property ladder away completely from many millennials.
“When you bring together all the costs associated with first-time home ownership, the lifetime costs of those properties have increased by two-thirds since the 1970s, and millennials have got the rawest deal of any generation.”
This stark barrier to entry explains why home ownership rates for people aged 30 have halved in the past 30 years, why typical first-time buyers are richer than they used to be, and why so many young people today are having to rely on the “bank of mum and dad”, the foundation said.
Alex Beer, welfare programme head at the Nuffield Foundation, said: “This important research highlights the many factors affecting housing affordability and how, in combination, they are increasing inequalities both between and within generations.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here