A LEADING green energy entrepreneur has thrown his support behind an island community as they wage a David and Goliath style battle against a major wind farm developer.
Steve McDonald, whose renewables projects include The UK’s biggest onshore wind farm project at Whitelee near Eaglesham in East Renfrewshire, said he believes most of the revenue from a proposed green energy development on common grazings around Stornoway would flow straight into foreign pockets if island crofters lost their bid to run their own wind farm.
He questioned whether the rival proposal by Lewis Wind Power, a private consortium owned by energy giant EDF and engineering firm Amec-Foster-Wheeler, would represent a “good return on investment” for the millions of pounds of UK taxpayers cash needed to create infrastructure. Mr McDonald, a co-founder of Sgurr Energy, has given his support to smaller community-based energy schemes, claiming most of the revenue from the development will go abroad if the LWP scheme is successful.
“I don’t think that’s a good return on investment to the UK taxpayer,” he added.
Island crofting communities are preparing to do battle against the energy consortium’s hostile bid to create a 36 turbine wind farm capable of powering 135,000 homes on common land. The islanders want to build a smaller wind farm on part of the site, with profits returning to the local community. Four townships - Melbost and Branahuie, Sandwick East Street, Sandwick North Street and Aginish – lodged applications to the Crofting Commission nearly a year ago.
However before the commission was able to act, Lewis Wind Power lodged a hostile application with the Land Court, seeking to develop the area with or without crofters’ consent. Landlord for the proposed site, the Stornoway Trust, has signed a 70 year lease to EDF and Amec for LWPs development.
Lewis Wind Power has insisted their plans will benefit crofters.
A spokesman for EDF said: “The Land Court will make sure the crofters on the Stornoway wind farm land get a fair deal in respect of the income they will receive in return for having wind farm infrastructure on their land.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article