Bird flu has been detected in two poultry workers in the UK, it has been confirmed.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) said it had detected the Influenza A (H5) virus in two employees in England but that there were no signs of human-to-human transmission.
It follows the introduction of an asymptomatic testing programme for people who have been in contact with infected birds.
A highly pathogenic variant of avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 has killed tens of thousands of wild birds across the UK over the past two years.
The two people returning positive tests are known to have recently worked on an infected poultry farm in England.
Neither has experienced any symptoms of avian influenza and both have since tested negative.
READ MORE: Gannets at Scottish colony reveal unusual side-effect of surviving avian flu
The UKHSA said, based on the timing of exposures and test results, one individual is likely to have had contamination of the nose and/or throat from material inhaled on the farm, whilst for the second individual it is more difficult to determine which is the case.
Further investigation is underway but, meanwhile, precautionary contact tracing has been undertaken for this second individual, the statement said.
Professor Susan Hopkins, chief medical adviser at UKHSA, said it was crucial the public did not touch dead birds.
“Current evidence suggests that the avian influenza viruses we’re seeing circulating in birds around the world do not spread easily to people," she said.
“However, we know already that the virus can spread to people following close contact with infected birds and this is why, through screening programmes like this one, we are monitoring people who have been exposed to learn more about this risk.
“Globally, there is no evidence of spread of this strain from person to person, but we know that viruses evolve all the time and we remain vigilant for any evidence of changing risk to the population.
“It remains critical that people avoid touching sick or dead birds, and that they follow the Defra advice about reporting.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here