Legislation that will set up Scotland’s new exams body needs “substantial amendment” to ensure the improvements ministers want to see are brought about, MSPs have insisted.
Members of the Scottish Parliament’s Education Committee said they backed the general principles of the Bill that will replace the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) with a new body called Qualifications Scotland.
But with this new organisation having the same functions as the SQA, the committee heard concerns the it could result in a “mere re-packaging” of the existing body.
MSPs on the Education, Children and Young People Committee have now challenged the Scottish Government to set out “how it will ensure that Qualifications Scotland will operate differently from the SQA”.
As the report was published, committee convener Douglas Ross made clear “substantial changes” are still required to the Education (Scotland) Bill – which also establishes the office of His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education in Scotland, setting out for the first time the detailed role and function of education inspectors in legislation.
Mr Ross said: “The committee recognises the need for a qualifications body and an independent inspectorate that holds the confidence and trust of learners, parents and carers, and teaching professionals.
-
Gilruth and SQA hauled before Holyrood's education committee amid Higher History saga
-
Government seeks teacher views as SQA admits fully independent review not considered
-
Investigation into History marking only interviewed those with links to the SQA
“While these long-awaited reforms could help to deliver bodies that hold this confidence, substantial changes are still required to ensure the Scottish Government’s approach succeeds.”
He continued: “In particular, we want the Scottish Government to take steps that will help rebuild public trust in the bodies that oversee education in Scotland, ensuring that there is strong accountability for these new bodies from the start.”
The committee report accepted that legislation alone “can not change culture”, with the MSPs saying this requires “leadership, a change to ways of working and a commitment to do things differently”
And while the committee backed the replacement of SQA and the creation of an independent inspectorate, the MSPs said they did “not yet have sufficient information on wider education reform”.
Their report added that committee “believes the Bill will require substantial amendment to ensure that the improvements envisaged by the Scottish Government in relation to engagement, governance, organisational culture and accountability, become a reality for learners, teachers and staff”.
Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for education and skills Miles Briggs said: “This damning report from the education committee makes it clear they think the SNP’s current plans to replace the SQA deliver no change at all.
“The SQA’s reputation is rightly tarnished among parents, pupils and teachers, yet the SNP are risking making the same mistakes with their new body.
“If SNP ministers are serious about restoring Scotland’s once world-leading education reputation, then they must change their current approach.
“The need for a credible qualifications body is abundantly clear after the monumental failures by the SQA over the years, but it appears ministers simply cannot be bothered to do the work required.
“They must reflect on the committee’s critical conclusions and come back with meaningful plans that will deliver the changes Scottish education desperately needs.”
Scottish Labour Education spokesperson Pam Duncan-Glancy said “Our education system desperately needs reform, but the SNP is in complete denial about the scale of reform needed.
“This stark report from the education committee highlights how far short the SNP reform falls, and that there are major shortcomings in the current version of the bill. The SNP government must heed these warnings and change direction.
“A shallow rebrand is not good enough to rebuild trust in our education system - we need genuine reform.
“Scottish Labour will work constructively to strengthen this Bill so it delivers a genuine change in direction and builds the education system pupils, parents, and teachers deserve.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel