Finance Secretary Shona Robison only has “limited room for manoeuvre” in next week’s Scottish Budget, experts have warned, despite the “significant” additional cash Holyrood ministers will receive from the UK Government.
The Scottish Government is due an additional £1.5 billion for the current financial year and a further £3.4 billion in 2025-26 as a result of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s UK Budget, but experts at the Fraser of Allander Institute said the settlement is still “tricky” for the Holyrood Finance Secretary.
Joao Sousa, deputy director at the Strathclyde University-based think tank, noted £7 out of every £8 spent by the Scottish Government goes on just four areas – health, pay, social security and grants to local government.
“This seriously limits their room for manoeuvre in changing the overall shape of the Budget,” he said.
He added that “figuring out the funding position for 2025-26 has been much more challenging” this year.
Dr Sousa said the lack of a medium term financial strategy from the Scottish Government this year had made this “near impossible” – but said the report from the Fraser of Allander Institute “set out the various pressures that the budget is likely to be under”.
It said that despite the increases in funding that have come as a result of the UK Government’s Budget, “the settlement for 2025-26 is still tricky for Shona Robison as she presents her Budget for 2025-26 next week, and she will have limited room for manoeuvre”.
With the public sector wage bill accounting for more than half of the Government’s day-to-day spending, the think tank stressed the “significant bearing” pay rises would have on the overall budget position.
With pay costs recurring each year, rises agreed in 2024-25 – such as the 5.5% for NHS workers – will “have a big impact on the overall budgetary decisions”, the report added.
In addition, public sector workers are on average paid more in Scotland, and given the larger public sector north of the border, the challenges here will be “even more acute”, the think tank said.
Its report stressed how decisions on pay, together with spending on areas like social security – where costs are higher than the funding received from the UK Government – have “put additional pressure on the Scottish Government’s budget”.
When pressures from pay, increased national insurance contributions and restoring the winter fuel payment are all taken into account, the report said that for next year, “there is little in the way of additional funding that isn’t already committed”.
The think tank went on to warn that if pay rises are “higher than planned”, the Scottish Government could need to take emergency action again.
READ MORE:
- Swinney warns of ‘a lot of disruption’ if MSPs don't back SNP budget
- Calls for MSPs to unite to pass pro-business Budget
- LibDems could abstain on SNP Budget allowing plans to pass
First Minister John Swinney and his predecessors have set out their determination to tackle child poverty, but the report said although spending on this has “grown significantly since 2018-19, it would not be fair to say that it has become a large part of the Scottish budget”.
The think tank noted spending in this area “remains under 3% of all discretionary resource funding”, adding capital spending on child poverty reduction – through for example the provision of affordable housing – has “actually fallen by 13% in real terms since 2019-20”.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The Scottish Budget will prioritise funding to deliver on the First Minister’s priorities, which include growing the economy.
“Last week the Scottish Parliament agreed with the Scottish Government motion that the UK Government should fully reimburse the over £700 million costs of employer national insurance contributions to the delivery of public services in Scotland due to the rise in employer contributions and that’s what needs to happen.
“This UK Government policy risks hampering economic growth and damaging public services and whilst discussions with the Treasury are ongoing, we still do not have certainty ahead of the Scottish budget.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel