First Minster John Swinney has said he is “dissatisfied” with the length of time it has taken for a decision to be made on the private prosecution of disgraced footballer David Goodwillie.
Goodwillie and former teammate David Robertson were ruled in a civil court in 2017 to have raped Denise Clair, but no criminal charges have been filed against the pair.
Ms Clair is now looking to launch a rare private prosecution – in which an individual or organisation seeks to prosecute the accused, rather than the Crown Office taking action – but is reliant on financial assistance.
Ms Clair’s case was raised in Holyrood by Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay.
“No credible explanation has ever been given as to why the Crown Office did not prosecute,” the Tory leader said.
“Frankly, the case stinks.
“Denise was forced to take civil action against the two men and a judge agreed that she had been raped.
“She has since asked the Government to fund a private criminal prosecution, but continues to be left in limbo.”
READ MORE
- David Goodwillie: Rape victim claims outrage is years too late
-
Susan Egelstaff: Goodwillie shouldn't be allowed to play football in public eye again
-
Solicitor General offers to meet woman raped by David Goodwillie
Responding to Mr Findlay, John Swinney said: “I think the Government has taken too long to consider the request that Ms Clair has made to us.
“And when I saw the news reports at the weekend, I asked for there to be greater urgency put into the engagement with her agents on this question.
“I am dissatisfied with how long it has taken, I express my apology through Mr Findlay to Ms Clair today.”
Mr Findlay also raised the case of Claire Inglis, who was murdered in her home three years ago.
Christopher McGowan was jailed for the murder, which a judge described as “beyond sadistic” after having been bailed five times for other offences despite previous convictions.
While Ms Inglis’s parents watched from the gallery, Mr Findlay said they were still “fighting for answers” after it emerged Stirling Council’s social services department had raised concern months before her death.
Responding, the First Minister said: “We have taken steps to ask Stirling Council to undertake further examination and exploration of the issues involved, to engage directly with Claire’s parents and obviously we will discuss those issues in this exchange today.
“I remain committed to making sure that the family receives the answers that they understandably deserve.”
A statement from Ms Inglis’s mum Fiona, released by the Scottish Tories, said: “We should not have to come to Parliament again, and on the third anniversary of our beloved daughter’s murder, to beg the First Minister for answers.
“We feel trapped and unable to move on because we continue to be deprived of basic but vital information.
“There is something far wrong with Scotland’s justice system when victims are kept in the dark and not treated as a priority.”
Both cases, Mr Findlay said, along with the passage of a Bill this week that would allow offenders serving short-term sentences to be automatically released after serving 40% of their term rather than 50%, were a symptom of “soft touch SNP justice”.
The First Minister said: “I will always take seriously the concerns of victims and will take the action necessary to ensure the interests of victims are fully and properly taken into account in all the steps that the Government takes.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article