A routine eye test used worldwide to diagnose used in newborns and infants to detect life-threatening conditions and problems which could lead to sight loss is skewed towards the white population, researchers have warned.
A paper by scientists from the University of St Andrews calls for the so-called 'Red' Reflex test to be "decolonised" after they carried out a study showing that the terminology was likely to lead to misinterpretation and "over-referral" of non-white babies for urgent second opinions which "[waste] resources and cause undue anxiety for families".
The test, which is part of the Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) in the UK, involves shining a light into an infant's eyes to observe the reflection from the retina.
READ MORE:
- Doctors quitting the NHS over racial abuse and discrimination
- Is our NHS racist? Calls for monitoring of racism against BME doctors
- People worry about the burden on NHS from immigrants. It's not that simple
- Jeane Freeman: Scot Govt 'prioritised Covid harms over other considerations'
The scientists note that a "normal" result is commonly expected to be red, but that this is based on presentations among white patients, perpetuating racial biases in healthcare.
The paper, published today in the journal Eye Nature, highlights that in those with darker skin tones, the reflex can present in different colours, such as yellow, orange, or less bright hues.
Renaming the test as the 'Fundal Reflex Test' would be an "anatomically accurate description that avoids implying a specific colour, thereby reducing misunderstanding and promoting equity and inclusivity".
They add: "Decolonizing medical terminology is essential for ensuring accurate diagnoses and culturally competent care."
The study used reflex videos of six adults reflecting a diverse range of ethnicities - Black, Asian Indian, Asian Afghan, Southeast Asian, White with fair hair, and White with dark hair - which were captured via an Arclight ophthalmoscope attached to a smartphone camera.
The Arclight ophthalmoscope—a low-cost, portable diagnostic tool—has been instrumental in training and equipping healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to perform this essential examination.
The researchers asked 27 first-year medical students to record their "subjective" impressions of the colour seen in the pupil space for each video.
An objective analysis was then provided by using an algorithm to calculate the mean objective Red-Green-Blue (RGB) value of all 'pupil space' pixels.
Subjectively, yellow, orange, and white were the most commonly recorded colours, while objectively, brown and orange were the most frequent.
Dr Andrew Blaikie, a consultant ophthalmologist in NHS Fife and senior lecturer at the University of St Andrews, said: "We need to think about changing the name away from the colour appearance to something about the anatomy, which is universal, rather than what the test looks like, which varies in different populations.
"Traditionally the name of this test is the ‘red reflex test’ because the colour looks reasonably red in white European people.
"When performed on different populations of varying skin pigmentation, and therefore different eye pigmentation it does not look red and so it is not an inclusive term.
"It's not covering the diversity of people that this test is being used on even in the UK let alone when working overseas.
"It's much important that we describe this test using a word which isn't related to colour, but instead to the anatomy of the test.
"Language shapes our perceptions and practices. Decolonising terminology has the potential to inspire similar initiatives across healthcare.
"It's a step toward dismantling long-standing biases, promoting inclusive medical education, and ensuring all patients, regardless of background, receive respectful and equitable care."
Dr Blaikie leads the Arclight Project, which is run by the university's School of Medicine to enable those working in low and middle income countries to equip, train and empower local health workers to diagnose and manage eye and ear disease.
READ MORE:
- New smallpox exhibition remembers Glasgow's forgotten 1950 outbreak
- Could scientists 'engineer' Salmonella bacteria to kill off bowel cancer?
- Lifestyle medicine: A 'common sense' approach that could change NHS
It aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and eye care outcomes for vulnerable populations worldwide, helping to address the very biases highlighted by this research.
The findings also align with the NHS Race and Health Observatory's review on neonatal assessments, which raised concerns about the use of skin colour in determining the Apgar score and identifying jaundice, highlighting the urgent need for updated, inclusive medical practices.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel