Wheelchair users should be able to sue airports and airlines which fail to accommodate them, according to an MP who has chosen not to fly “for many years”.
Daniel Francis, whose daughter has cerebral palsy, said the prospect of damaged equipment on or after a holiday is “too upsetting to consider”.
The Labour MP for Bexleyheath and Crayford laid the Aviation (Accessibility) Bill in the House of Commons on Tuesday, as he called for tighter regulations which airlines and airports must follow to support mobility or visually impaired passengers.
Paralympic wheelchair racing champion Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, who is in charge of a Department for Transport aviation accessibility expert group, has vowed to work with Mr Francis to develop new policy.
The Bill is also being sponsored Melanie Ward, the Labour MP for Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy.
READ MORE
- Trump's son says Swinney is 'nasty' and Scotland is 'bad for business'
- ScotGov could be forced to boost university funding
- ‘The whole legal aid system’s going down the tubes,’ warns top lawyer
Mr Francis told MPs: “My family has taken the decision for many years that flying would simply be too much hassle, and the distress of a damaged or lost wheelchair at the end of a flight is too upsetting to consider."
He added: “For those that are able to get on a plane in the first place, they are often left with the worry of their wheelchair being damaged in transit or from a lack of knowledge by airport staff.
“It’s therefore paramount that a single set of rules and regulations are applied to all airlines to promote better knowledge among airline and airport staff to minimise the risk of damages to wheelchair and mobility scooters.”
Mr Francis called for a “clearer, standardised protocols that can be replied upon by all” and a “suitable compensation and penalty charge scheme” with financial penalties for airlines which fall short of agreed standards.
He also warned that while airports are responsible for providing victims of wheelchair damage with a replacement, it does not currently have to be on a like-for-like basis.
On access, Mr Francis said “we all hear stories and see videos of wheelchair users being forced to crawl through or off an airplane due to a lack of equipment, knowledge and space on board”.
He continued: “The issues of accessibility can occur at check-in desks and security, along with a lack of clear signage and inefficient procedures. Once passengers have boarded the plane, the issues begin to manifest ten-fold for disabled passengers.
“The current design of many aircraft does not meet the needs of many passengers. There is often inadequate space for wheelchair users to navigate the cabin and the facilities available on board such as accessible bathrooms are limited or non-existent on many flights.
“However, while airlines may offer assistance to board and disembark, the quality and availability of this assistance can vary drastically from one airline to another and there is little if any regulation.
“Making airports legally liable for the bad treatment and discriminatory practices against disabled passengers would give consumers the ability to sue airlines for disability discrimination.
“Many air carriers do not provide the space or the safety requirements for a passenger to fly in their own wheelchair, and to facilitate this, wheelchair blocks should be included to facilitate wheelchair users being able to safely remain in their chairs throughout the duration of their flight.”
Ms Ward said: "This Bill would provide much-needed reassurance to wheelchair users when travelling by air.
"In 2024, everyone should be able to travel with safety and dignity. The reality of damaged wheelchairs, uncomfortable or painful journeys or even crawling off of aeroplanes has become too common among disabled traveller in recent years. It must end.
"I want to see wheelchair guidance observed by airlines and enforced by the Civil Aviation Authority, as well as accountability when things go wrong, and that is why I strongly support this bill."
MPs are due to consider the Bill in greater detail at its second reading on July 4 2025.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here