Former health secretary Jeane Freeman has told the UK Covid inquiry that the Scottish Government's primary aim was to "minimise harm from the virus".
Giving evidence for the first time during module three of the inquiry, which is currently examining the impact of the pandemic on healthcare systems across the UK, Ms Freeman was asked to comment on her own witness statement in which she stated that the Scottish Government had "consistently and collectively prioritised the direct risk of Covid-19 to health in Scotland over other important policy considerations".
READ MORE:
- The Covid inquiry, airborne transmission and a new row about masks
- UK Covid inquiry to examine impact of pandemic on healthcare
- Scottish and UK Governments were 'not properly prepared' for pandemic
- Nicola Sturgeon admits deleting Covid WhatsApps despite promising to hand them over
Asked by Emma Price, counsel to the inquiry, whether ministers had given "adequate consideration" to the indirect health harms resulting from Covid restrictions, such as the suspension of cancer screening and non-urgent elective work on March 17 2020, Ms Freeman said that "none of the decision we were making were risk-free".
She added: "They were always decisions about levels of harm and whether or not one could mitigate the harm that you anticipated would be caused by taking a particular decision."
The priority was to "minimise the harm from the virus", said Ms Freeman, but other harms "were given full consideration on the basis of how can we mitigate those harms".
Ms Freeman, who stood down as health secretary in May 2021, said noted that Scotland differs from England because it abolished the internal market system in 2004, which sees different NHS trusts compete with one another for funding.
In Scotland, health boards are directly accountable to the Scottish Government - rather than an "arms-length body" such as NHS England.
Ms Freeman said this meant that NHS Scotland is structured in such a way that boards "must apply national strategy to local circumstances", and meant that Covid restrictions - such as screening pauses - were applied "at the same time, consistently" which "gave public assurance that what was happening in their area was happening everywhere".
Ms Freeman also insisted that the Scottish Government "never ruled out" the possibility that the Covid virus could spread by airborne transmission, despite then-national clinical director Professor Jason Leitch stating during the first lockdown that the virus "is not airborne - it has to be spread by droplets".
This was the basis for advice at the time on social distancing and hand-washing, but not initially ventilation or face masks.
Giving evidence to the inquiry on Friday, Professor Colin McKay - who was chief of medicine at Glasgow Royal Infirmary in 2020 - said his infection control teams were convinced Covid was airborne virus as early as April 2020, at a time when the World Health Organisation and NHS guidance stated this was not the case.
Ms Freeman said: "We never ruled out the possibility of aerosol distribution of the virus.
"While the focus was on droplet transmission, aerosol was never ruled out as a definite no in our minds so we were open to that."
In May 2020, the Scottish Government diverged from UK-level infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines by advising that healthcare and ambulance workers performing CPR - which was not considered an aerosol-generating procedure - should be able to request high-grade FFP3 filtration masks.
Ms Freeman said: "It was my view that where there was such a debate, the sensible approach was to go with the professional judgement of healthcare and clinical staff on the ground...if their professional judgement was that they should be wearing additional PPE, then we should provide that additional PPE."
The inquiry was also shown documents where Ms Freeman had been asked to sign off on the use of FFP3 which were recently past expiry date but which had passed "stringent quality assurance" tests.
This was said to be due to "challenges in the supply chain" and the "fragile position" of stocks.
"This is a dilemma for our national procurement service in that, sensibly, you would think you should hold a volume of stock that is there ready to respond in the immediate period to an emergency that might arise," said Ms Freeman.
"But equally, stock has time limit to it and this was a good example of stock that was held but at the point where the emergency arose and you needed to use it, it had passed on the basis of its time limit that [expiry] date."
She said work was done to ensure the PPE would still be effective, and that she had sought "additional assurances" from experts including the Academy of Royal Colleges.
In future, she said there should be a "rolling program" whereby stock distributed and replenished regularly, rather than "not reordering on the basis that you think you have enough".
The inquiry has previously heard that concerns emerged that out-of-date masks were "falling apart" and did not strap onto NHS workers faces properly.
A BMA survey in April 2020 found that 55% of its members felt "pressured to work in a high risk area despite not having adequate PPE".
Ms Freeman said the key issue was that the filtration device element of FFP3 masks functioned, and that other problems "could be solved".
She added that she received daily updates on PPE stock position and distribution during her tenure, and that reports of shortages tended to be related to local and internal distribution to and within particular hospitals rather than nationally available supplies.
A mailbox was set up in April 2020 to enable health and care staff to report problems.
However, Ms Freeman acknowledged that sometimes staff had difficulty "getting their hands on PPE that I knew was there".
She added: "My job was to try and resolve that issue.
"If we actually had that stock, we needed it to get to the frontline...nothing will run smoothly all the time, so my concern was to make sure there were as many open channels as possible, but equally important to make sure we had follow through on those channels."
Former First Minister, and Health Secretary, Humza Yousaf will give evidence to the inquiry later today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel