A team from the University of Aberdeen have discovered the Black Death was present as far north as the Granite City as late as the 1640s.
The research – published in the journal PlosOne – has also detailed a surprising care for the dead in Scotland at a time when the country was also being decimated by a civil war.
It has confirmed that the bacteria responsible for bubonic plague was present as far north as Aberdeen in the late 1640s with a team of archaeologists, osteologists, historians and ancient DNA specialists looking into the disease and how it affected Scotland.
The team identified presence of the ancient DNA of the bacterial agent Yersinia pestis in human remains associated with a plague pit in Aberdeen, the first time direct evidence of the plague has been identified, using state of the art aDNA techniques, in Scotland.
The plague is often referred to as the ‘Black Death’ in reference to the second global pandemic in the mid-14th century, but the Yersinia pestis organism was responsible for numerous versions over centuries, with the last in Scotland occurring from 1644 to 1649.
READ MORE
-
Hospices facing 'heartbreaking' decision to turn patients away amid funding crisis
-
SNP insists National Care Service not scrapped despite mothballing of flagship policy
-
More people are living with multiple conditions – and it's a big problem for NHS
The team, led by Professor Marc Oxenham, mapped the spread of the plague in Scotland during this last six-year-long epidemic and examined remains excavated in an industrial compound at York Place, Aberdeen, in 1987. The site was associated with the general location of plague pits that were established on the Queen’s Links during the 1647-8 outbreak of the plague.
Professor Oxenham said: “This final Scottish outbreak was thought to have started as a result of infected Scottish soldiers returning from the siege of Newcastle in October 1644.
“Initially in the Borders it spread north over the following years through Central Scotland, Perthshire and Angus.
“We can see from an entry in the Council Register of the Burgh that by April 1647 Aberdeen was steeling itself for the return of the plague, which had spared the city since the last outbreak almost 100 years previously in 1545, as it was noted that the ‘plague of pestilence was raging in Inverbervie’, just 26 miles to the south of the city.”
By this period Scottish cities and towns were well experienced in fighting the plague, usually in the form of measures to limit the mobility of the population and the research focused on the ‘human response’ to the final Scottish outbreak.
“This was a particularly desperate time to have been alive in Scottish history,” Professor Oxenham added.
“In many regions the populations were facing the ravages of war, economic hardship, and the additional complications of a terrible epidemic. In Brechin for example, some 600 individuals, or half of the population of the town, are reported to have died within a few months of 1647.
“And so we were interested in the human responses to the rampages of the plague and, in particular, if there was a general fear of the plague victims during this last epidemic.”
The researches examined teeth and bones that had been taken from recovered skeletal remains to confirm they died between 1647 and 1648 and that the Yersinia pestis organism was present.
They then looked at the practices associated with their burials to gain new understanding into the treatment of those who died from the plague.
Dr Rebecca Crozier, who directs the osteoarchaeology program at the University of Aberdeen, said: “The plague is generally associated with the digging of plague pits to dispose of the dead but what the team found was numerous instances of normal burial and memorialisation of plague victims within church grounds.
“Clearly, some of these individuals must have been known to be victims of the plague by their mourners whom, it would appear, may have been less afraid of contracting the plague from their dead as we might assume.
“This suggests we are not seeing a loss of humanity in the face of the terrible vista of the plague, but rather we are witnessing care and compassion for the dead, despite the very real risks to the bereaved.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel