Newly-minted Burberry chief executive Joshua Schulman will use the brand's UK heritage in a bid to win back customers and turn around the loss-making company's fortunes.
The revamp will see a renewed focus on trench coats and scarves with the distinctive Burberry check, with a less ambitious pricing strategy on bags and shoes. Mr Schulman, who took up the top post in July, has also announced the launch of a £40 million cost savings programme that will result in an unspecified number of job losses.
"We took pricing too high across the board," Mr Schulman said at an analysts' briefing "We created new brand codes... that were not familiar or recognisable for our customers."
Read more:
His comments came after Burberry posted an adjusted operating loss of £41m for the six months to the end of September, with the company suffering more than its peers from consumers' waning appetite for luxury goods in China and elsewhere.
There will be a £29m inventory writedown to get rid of unsold stock. Sales in Burberry's second quarter fell at the same pace as in the first three months of the year, with revenue for the first half down 20% in constant currencies.
Leather goods and shoes underperformed in the first half, Burberry said, while outerwear did better than average.
Asked about what had gone wrong at Burberry, Mr Schulman said: "We took pricing too high across the board. We created new brand codes... that were not familiar or recognisable for our customers."
Looking ahead, he said the company would be "incredibly disciplined" with its brand and market itself as timeless British luxury. While pricing in some areas will be less aggressive, Mr Schulman said Burberry's positioning will remain in luxury and there are no plans to make it an "accessible" luxury brand.
Burberry is widely seen as a takeover target, but sources close to the matter have denied media reports that Italy's Moncler is preparing a bid. Mr Schulman declined to comment on speculation but said Burberry's independence - separate from a luxury conglomerate - was an "asset".
Shares in Burberry closed yesterday's trading more than 18% higher, up 136.6p at 868p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here