The Scottish Government has denied scrapping the National Care Service, despite announcing a further delay to the flagship policy.
In a letter to Holyrood's Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Care Minister Maree Todd said the Bill bringing in the centralised service would no longer be put to a vote this year, and a "revised timetable" would be set out in the New Year.
But with less than 18 months until the next Holyrood election, it will be difficult to develop legislation that would secure the support of enough MSPs before the Parliamentary session ends.
Read more:
- Hospice CEOs warn that sector is 'struggling enormously'
- More than £28 million spent on National Care Service work
- Council leaders withdraw support for National Care Service Bill
- Care service plan to be dealt fatal blow as Greens to withdraw support
Ms Todd confirmed that Ministers will drop the first part of the National Care Service (Scotland) Bill which would have seen the government set up regional “care boards” directly accountable to Scottish ministers.
However, they will push ahead with parts two and three on care home visits and inspections.
There has been mounting criticism of the plan which has already cost the taxpayer around £30 million.
Crucially, councils, trade unions and carer's organisations all withdrew their support.
The SNP's chances of getting the Bill through Holyrood were effectively killed off last month when the Greens said they could no longer back it at the Stage 2 vote.
The plan to end the "postcode lottery" for care was a key policy of Nicola Sturgeon, who promised “the most significant public service reform since the creation of the NHS in 1948”.
John Swinney was challenged on the future of the service during First Minister's Questions.
The SNP leader said he accepted that there was "a lot of opposition to the National Care Service from a variety of institutional stakeholders”.
He also said he recognises the “issues within Parliament”, and said the Government will now “take its time to ensure that we get proposals right”.
“I have made it very clear that my Government is a listening government.
“We are listening to the views of members of the public, we are listening to the fact that people from disabled people’s organisations, carers, service users, are urging us to implement a National Care Service because they are dissatisfied, as I am, with the variation in care around the country, the postcode lottery.”
Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay said the SNP had "already wasted £29m on a National Care Service that has not cared for a single person."
He added: “These plans should be scrapped entirely and investment put into frontline social care where it is so desperately needed.”
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said Scotland's care system was "fundamentally broken."
“Scots are seeing their care packages cut by this SNP government. While they have been fighting for their failed plan, families have been fighting for basic reforms to support their loved ones.”
This process has been a shambles and a disgrace," he added.
“Three years, three health ministers, and three First Ministers on and nothing to show for it.
“Just more SNP incompetence and waste that is holding Scotland back."
The Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: “If this is the death knell of this centralising ministerial takeover of social care, I am glad.
"Scottish Liberal Democrats are the only party to have opposed it from day one. For four years, the SNP has wasted £30m a bureaucratic power grab."
COSLA’s Health and Social Care Spokesperson, Councillor Paul Kelly, said they were also happy that the Scottish Government was "finally listening" concerns about the legislation.
“There is no doubt that our care system requires urgent reform and sustainable investment. Care is a fundamental part of our communities, supporting people to live healthy, safe & fulfilling lives.
“Council budgets have been cut by the Scottish Government year-on-year which leaves Councils no other options than to consider cuts to care and other vital local services. This is having an impact on both those accessing and delivering care support and cannot continue. We must urgently see care valued for the critical role it plays in supporting people and society. "
STUC General Secretary Roz Foyer described it as a "deeply welcome move from the Scottish Government."
She added: "It is correct that they have, albeit belatedly, listened to the voices around the table who urged them to see sense.
“The Bill, as it stands, was deeply flawed and had lost the confidence of workers and other sector partners. It does nothing to address the key weaknesses within the current system – low pay, insecure conditions, chronic staff retention and a complete overdependence on highly financialised, profit-driven providers.
“We can wipe the slate clean. Whilst we await full confirmation the Bill is dead for the foreseeable, that doesn’t mean we can’t implement the reforms our social care needs for the here and now."
Read more:
- Roz Foyer: So many broken promises: why we've walked away from care service Bill
- Over 5,000 Scots waiting for NHS social care assessment
- Maree Todd: UK employment law shakeup 'good for social care'
Louise Gilmour, GMB Scotland secretary, said the botched blueprint was a wasted opportunity.
“A chance to do things better has been squandered and ministers should stop wasting words on a new care service and start building a better one.
“Fairly rewarding the skills, experience and commitment of workers delivering frontline care would have ended the crisis in recruitment and retention that is sabotaging the service.
“A huge amount of time, money and goodwill has been frittered away on plans for a national care service that failed to properly address that fundamental issue.
“If our members in care had received a penny pay rise every time politicians promised them £15 an hour, for example, we would not be in such crisis."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel