Kate Forbes has said Stephen Flynn would be a “brilliant asset” to the Scottish Parliament.
Scotland’s Deputy First Minister said the SNP Westminster leader is “exactly the kind of person” needed at Holyrood.
Mr Flynn announced on Tuesday that he intends to stand in the 2026 Scottish Parliament election.
The Aberdeen South and North Kincardine seat is already held by SNP MSP Audrey Nicoll, who Mr Flynn will have to compete against.
His ambition to become an MSP has faced criticism from within the party after he said he would continue to keep his current job as the MP for Aberdeen South until the next general election.
READ MORE:
Stephen Flynn slammed by SNP colleagues over Holyrood bid
SNP's Stephen Flynn announces bid to become MSP in 2026 election
Speaking to the PA news agency during a visit to the Clyde Gateway East Business Park in Glasgow on Tuesday, Ms Forbes said it is for the SNP to decide whether Mr Flynn can run.
She said: “Can I say at the outset, Stephen Flynn would make a brilliant asset to Holyrood and to the Scottish Parliament.
“He’s exactly the kind of person that we need representing local communities in the Scottish Parliament.
“Now, I won’t get involved in local contests because Audrey Nicol I know to have been a brilliant convener of the justice committee and a brilliant local advocate as well.
“But the point is that we have democratic processes here, internally within the party, which I’m not involved in, and also externally and, ultimately, for the electorate to decide, as they decided most recently in Douglas Ross’s case.”
Mr Flynn – who said he would not accept two salaries if elected – had previously criticised former Scottish Tory leader Mr Ross for taking up positions at Holyrood and Westminster at the same time.
Ms Forbes is also among the many SNP politicians who have attacked Mr Ross for having had multiple jobs, including as a football referee.
The Deputy First Minister wrote on social media last year: “Douglas ‘three jobs’ Ross hardly spends any time in Scot Parl or speaking to his own party colleagues.
“Which is only one of the many, many reasons why I’ve never said more than a passing hello to him since he was elected. Conference hyperbole compensating for a failed Tory Gov.”
Asked why Mr Flynn could run as an MSP without quitting his position as an MP, Ms Forbes said on Wednesday: “That will be a decision for [the SNP’s] national executive committee.
“But let me be very clear in terms of my own strong view, we need the best talent we can get representing Scottish communities the length and breadth of this country.
“We need them in Holyrood making decisions.
“The beauty of democracy is that it ultimately will be a decision for the local electorate as to who represents them, both within the party and within the public.
“Now, most recently, that was put to the test with Douglas Ross, he wasn’t returned as the MP, and therefore it proves the point that democracy works.”
SNP MSP Emma Roddick said on Monday that she hopes Mr Flynn will “rethink” his decision to hold two seats at once.
She said on X: “Party members set this rule for good reasons. Rightly, Douglas Ross was criticised for holding two roles simultaneously.”
But Mr Flynn won support from former SNP MP Joanna Cherry, who was prevented from running for Holyrood in 2021 due to the SNP’s rules around MPs becoming MSPs.
She said: “I wish Stephen well. The SNP badly needs new blood at Holyrood.
“The rule against dual mandates introduced by the NEC in 2021 was not ‘election specific’, it was person specific. It served its purpose and I predict it will be removed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel