Funding earmarked for rural housing developments was used to build homes in the cities of Aberdeen and Edinburgh.
A recent Freedom of Information Request (FOI) has revealed that over £100million that was intended for Scotland’s rural communities has been poured into urban homes in Edinburgh and Aberdeen City councils.
Since 2018, £104.8million of money ringfenced by the Scottish Government to build affordable housing in rural Scotland has been granted to Edinburgh and Aberdeen city councils to build new homes, despite the urban local authorities already having access to funding for city developments.
Read more:
- Farming Unions rally against Budget decisions and head to London to voice their fears
- Tesco partners with milk suppliers to transform dairy sustainability
-
Family farms facing financial strain due to inheritance tax changes
The rural business organisation Scottish Land & Estates (SLE) is calling on the Scottish Housing Minister to return the funds.
SLE’s housing policy adviser, Anna Gardiner, added that this situation coming to light should lead to an urgent review of the Scottish Government’s criteria for selecting new housing sites, with the six-fold classification guidance proving ineffective at discerning between urban and rural areas.
Ms Gardiner, said: “Scotland’s rural communities are being short-changed by the flawed criteria for urban-rural classifications. Not only do they receive a lower proportion of funding in the first place, but the funding they are receiving is now being spent by city local authorities. This is a wholly unacceptable revelation that must be addressed urgently.
“At SLE, we have often made the case that rural Scotland is treated unfairly, with little understanding of the challenges facing our communities. Regardless of our contention that rural issues are poorly understood by some aspects of government, surely even they would agree that classifying Gilmerton in Edinburgh, or Dyce in Aberdeen as ‘rural’ is a step too far.
“The Scottish Government must take steps to return this funding to the rural communities it belongs to, and robustly interrogate the mechanisms that allowed this rural funding to be funnelled into the cities.
“We know that housing shortages are a key driver of rural depopulation, and any measures to help deliver new affordable homes in areas hit by this issue can make a huge difference. It is concerning that those communities struggling to remain sustainable because of a lack of homes, also have difficulty accessing funding ringfenced for rural housing, whilst it is apparent that those very funds are being capitalised on in what are undoubtedly large urban areas.”
The Scottish housing minister Paul McLennan said: “Good quality housing is essential to attract and retain people in our rural communities. We remain committed to delivering 110,000 affordable homes by 2032, of which at least 70% will be for social rent and at least 10% in our rural and island communities.
“Demand led funds such as the Rural and Islands Housing Fund and the Rural Key workers Fund are key elements of our approach.
“These funds complement the main Affordable Housing Supply Programme which is delivered through Local Authorities and Registered Social Landlords.
“Outwith these rural-specific funds, funding for delivery of affordable homes in rural and island areas is not ringfenced and homes delivered through the affordable housing programme are classified using the six-fold urban rural classification based on information provided by Affordable Housing Supply Programme grant applicants.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here