The dollar has surged today with financial markets reacting positively to Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election, as experts flagged sweeping policy changes likely under the incoming Republican administration.
Luke Bartholomew, deputy chief economist at Edinburgh-based fund management group abrdn, declared financial markets were reacting in a way consistent with a Republican “red wave”.
However, he underlined potential for the situation to “evolve”, highlighting among other things the prospects of higher tariffs.
The danger of higher tariffs will be a worry to some Scottish businesses, notably including those in the Scotch whisky sector.
Scottish First Minister John Swinney warned Donald Trump's presidency could be "very damaging" for Scotland's whisky sector amid fears of tariff increases.
He also raised concerns that jobs could be hit in the whisky industry, as well as in the wider food and drinks sector and in manufacturing.
The pound was in early afternoon trading around $1.2856, down more than one-and-a-half cents on its 5pm close in London on Tuesday night of $1.3014.
The FTSE-100 index of leading shares was up 77.97 points at 8250.36 points in early afternoon trading - as stock markets across Europe rose sharply in the wake of Mr Trump’s decisive victory - boosted in part by sterling’s weakness against the dollar.
Mr Bartholomew highlighted the effect on financial markets of the election having delivered a clear-cut result.
Read more
He said this morning: “With the results of the presidential race becoming clear fairly early on, the market-implied expected volatility over coming days has collapsed."
Mr Bartholomew observed: “More generally, financial markets are behaving in a manner consistent with a red wave. The dollar is stronger, treasury yields are higher, US stock futures are up, and oil is lower. This implies the market is focusing on the reflationary aspects of Trump’s policies, with the prospect of tax cuts - and the avoidance of parts of Harris’s agenda - boosting risk sentiment.”
However, he added: “As different aspects of his agenda move into focus over time, this reaction may evolve - especially given the prospects for higher tariffs, and the size of potential fiscal stimulus in an already full-employment economy. Indeed, the latest survey data show the US economy remains solid.”
Blair Couper, investment director at abrdn, said: “Over the longer term, a Trump victory is likely to mean a more lax regulatory environment, escalating trade tariffs and potential attempts to repeal components of the Inflation Reduction Act. Markets had already been pricing in the likelihood of a Trump victory. However, it is looking likely that the Republicans will take a sweep of Congress which will make it easier for the party to enact their policy agenda.
“Under this scenario, we believe those areas that could come under pressure are companies more likely to be subject to tariff increases and areas of [the Inflation Reduction Act] that are easier to repeal, such as European auto manufacturers, electric vehicles, and offshore wind.”
However, Nigel Green, of financial advisory and asset management company deVere Group, declared “the Trump-driven dip in renewable energy stocks will be perceived as a strategic buying opportunity by savvy investors”.
Read more
- Ian McConnell: ‘Their Brexit deal’? But Labour has opted for 'scandalous destruction'
- Ian McConnell: Nauseating and excruciating in equal measure
He observed shares in renewable energy-focused Ørsted were down14% at one point yesterday in the wake of news of Mr Trump’s victory, with fellow Danish company and wind turbine manufacturer Vestas down 10%, “as concerns grow that Donald Trump could halt key renewable projects once he is back in the White House”.
Mr Green said: “Trump’s promise to stop offshore wind projects on ‘day one’ of his presidency has raised concerns among renewable energy companies, especially those heavily invested in the offshore wind market. The market's reaction is understandable, yet it overlooks the broader, global trend toward clean energy that continues to gain momentum, regardless of political cycles.”
He added: ““Despite the potential for a temporary slowdown in some US-based projects, the long-term outlook for the renewable energy sector remains incredibly positive.
“This presents a significant opportunity for investors to buy into the sector at a discount while the market remains focused on short-term uncertainties. While the US may experience a period of political turbulence, the global renewable energy transition is not dependent on any one country or political leader."
Commenting on the impact on the US shares, and particular sectors, Mr Couper said: “Share prices of US companies with supply chains in China are also likely to react negatively whilst domestic manufacturing and US small and mid-cap companies are likely to outperform. With President Trump at the helm, America also faces elevated inflation risks from these policies so we’re likely to see [interest]-rate-sensitive sectors react and the dollar strengthen.
“Areas like financials (i.e. banks) could perform well as rates stay higher for longer. Whilst areas like real estate and growth equities would likely be negatively impacted by higher duration, it is likely that this would be offset by the positive view for markets overall from his policies so we have yet to see whether these sectors would be negatively impacted or not.”
Aaron Rock, head of nominal rates at abrdn, said: “Markets can take solace from a swift resolution of the US electoral process. With fears of contested counts seemingly allayed, repricing of ‘Trump trades’ has been orderly.
“The next challenge is how to trade rhetoric versus policy. Trump’s first term gave a mixed picture in this regard. We expect tax cuts to consumers and business in short order, a key plank of Trump’s populist-leaning outlook. Tariffs may be ratcheted up over the time, for now a threat rather than a reality. Either way, it appears very likely that yet more fiscal expansion is on the way. This does not play well with Trump’s wish to have the Fed (Federal Reserve) cut rates aggressively.”
Ben Lofthouse, portfolio manager of Henderson International Income Trust, said: "The equity market is responding positively to the fact that the US election looks like it has a clear winner, and that winner is Donald Trump. US interest rates have been rising over the last week, and have continued to rise today, so the election outcome is considered to be potentially inflationary and therefore negative for fixed income markets. People had expected that the outcome would be closer than it looks and were expecting potential disruption. An uncontested win is itself positive for sentiment."
Mr Lofthouse added: "Whilst the win brings uncertainty for companies in terms of potential tariffs, there has been a general move towards moving manufacturing either closer to or into the US, and a Trump presidency is likely to accelerate that. Mr Trump has campaigned on a mandate that includes further tax cuts for US companies, and less government regulation, which are generally taken positively by investors, and as a result US domestic companies are expected to be beneficiaries. Many US companies we have met this year have attributed lower levels of activity due to caution before the election, so there could be an acceleration of activity in the US post the election.
"It is hard to say what the impact on global markets and inflation will be yet as many of the potential tariff increases are considered by many to be negotiation positions to extract better terms of trade, so may not come to pass, but this will not be known for some time.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here