When Kamala Harris appeared on ABC’s "The View" last month, it was supposed to be a friendly forum to introduce herself to Americans unfamiliar with her story.
The Democratic presidential nominee instead struggled to explain what she would do differently than President Joe Biden. “Not a thing that comes to mind,” Harris, the incumbent vice president, told the hosts.
Following President-elect Donald Trump’s lopsided election victory over Harris, that television moment underscored a fatal flaw of Harris’ campaign that doomed her election bid – an inability to separate herself from an unpopular president whose approval ratings have hovered around 40% for most of his four years in the White House.
David Axelrod, former longtime adviser to Barack Obama, called the exchange − which became a Trump ad − “disastrous” for Harris as he recapped the election outcome on CNN early Wednesday morning. “There’s no doubt about it. The question is: What motivated it?”
In poll after poll, Americans for months overwhelmingly said they believe the country was headed in the wrong direction.
Harris cast herself as a "new generation of leadership" and the forward-looking candidate who would work across the aisle and seek solutions, not political warfare, to address America's concerns with rising costs and housing affordability.
But given Harris’ status as a sitting vice president, she never fit the mould of a traditional “change candidate” and she remained tethered to Biden – staying loyal to him even as Americans made clear they disapproved of his handling of inflation and migration at the southern border.
In the end, the election wasn’t a nail-biter like many expected. It was a resounding victory for Trump and a rejection of Harris and the Democratic Party, with Republicans also gaining control of the U.S. Senate.
Trump's victory became all-but-certain when the former president was the projected winner of the battleground state of Pennsylvania and its 19 electoral votes. It's a state that Democrats had only lost once since 1988. That came in 2016 with Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton.
The Harris campaign devoted significant resources to four Sun Belt battlegrounds − Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina − but she appeared unlikely to win any of them. And the Democrats' so-called "blue wall" crumbled with Harris trailing Trump in Michigan and losing outright in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Harris and her campaign hoped to win the White House by bringing over moderate Republican and independent voters fed up with nearly a decade of division in the era of Donald Trump.
Yet the Democratic nominee lost the election in large part because she was unable to prevent core Democratic constituencies − Black, Latino and young voters − from splintering.
Harris underperformed with voters of color − particularly Latino voters − but also Black voters in urban centers such as Philadelphia, Detroit and Milwaukee. Despite maintaining Democrats' growing strength in college-educated suburbs, it was not enough to overcome Trump's gains in Democratic strongholds.
Harris carried Black voters 86%-12% and Latino voters 53%-45%, according to CNN exit polls. But in the 2020 election, Biden won Black voters by a wider 92%-8% margin over Trump and Latinos 65%-32%.
Meanwhile, Harris worked to limit the bleeding in heavily Republican rural counties in states like Pennsylvania, but she ultimately underperformed Biden in 2020 in these places, returning to the levels Clinton got in 2016.
READ MORE
-
US election LIVE as Trump projected to have won the presidency
-
Democrats can blame their own hubris and arrogance for Donald Trump success
-
Republicans have won the Senate but what does it mean for America?
From the beginning, Harris tried to make the race a referendum on Trump.
In the final weeks of the campaign, Harris escalated her rhetoric, calling the former president a fascist, warning that he is "unhinged and unstable," and highlighting the assessment of Trump's former White House chief of staff, John Kelly, who alleged Trump made past admiring statements about Adolf Hitler.
She increasingly leaned into framing the election as a fight for democracy, much like Biden did before he dropped out of the race in 2024.
“Kamala Harris lost this election when she pivoted to focus almost exclusively on attacking Donald Trump,” veteran pollster Frank Luntz said on X, formerly Twitter. “Voters already know everything there is about Trump – but they still wanted to know more about Harris’ plans for the first hour, first day, first month and first year of her administration.
“It was a colossal failure for her campaign to shine the spotlight on Trump more than on Harris’ own ideas,” Luntz said.
Harris, who campaigned aggressively on restoring abortion access, won female voters by a sizable 54%-44% margin, according to CNN exit polls, but it was a slimmer margin than Biden's 57%-42% performance with women in 2020. Trump won male voters over Harris by the same 54%-44% margin as Harris won women.
The abortion issue ended up not being the galvanizing force it was in 2022 when Democrats exceeded expectations in the midterms.
Harris' loss marks the second time in three election cycles that Democrats have fielded a female presidential candidate in hopes of making history − only to both times lose to Trump.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel