Labour’s support in Scotland has fallen to its lowest level since Nicola Sturgeon stepped down as first minister, with a new poll showing a sharp drop following Rachel Reeves's budget.
The survey by Norstat for the Sunday Times put Labour on 23% at the constituency vote, down seven points since August. On the list the party was at 22%, down six points.
The SNP’s position is unchanged, holding at 33% on the constituency and 29% on the regional list.
According to projections by Sir John Curtice, this would give Mr Sarwar’s party 29 MSPs, while the SNP would return 51.
READ MORE
- Council probe into £1million rates debt at former factory in Glasgow
- New Alex Salmond allegation being investigated by police
- MSPs urge Commonwealth Games to protect women’s sports categories
The Scottish Conservatives are up three points in the constituency vote to 15% and 14% on the list.
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has added two points in constituencies and is on the list to win the support of 11% in both.
The Greens are on 6% in the constituency and 9% on the list while the Lib Dems are 10% in the constituency and 9% on the list.
Prof Curtice projected the Tories would return 16 MSPs, down from 31, while Reform would win 12, the Lib Dems 11 and the Greens 10.
This would leave the SNP and Greens four seats short of a pro-independence majority.
However, they would still have more seats than Labour, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats combined, leaving Reform as the wild card.
Just 17% of respondents believe Ms Reeves’s budget will have a positive impact on their household while 29% said it would be negative.
Writing in the paper, Prof Curtice said: “Saturday’s poll reveals that voter disillusion with the new prime minister and UK government has taken a significant toll on the party’s prospects north of the border.
"Labour’s Westminster support is down by nine points since Norstat’s previous poll in August and has plummeted by 12 points since July. Sir Keir Starmer’s net approval rating has fallen to a record low of -28, down from -5 in August.
“Crucially for Anas Sarwar, Labour’s Holyrood ratings are damaged too.
"The party’s constituency vote is down seven points to 23%, the party’s lowest rating since Nicola Sturgeon announced her resignation in February last year.
"The position on the regional vote is no better.
“Yet there is little sign of a recovery in the SNP’s fortunes. The party’s support has only edged up since August, and, at 30%, the party’s Westminster rating simply matches its disappointing performance in July. Swinney’s net approval rating is unchanged, and still in negative territory.”
Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday Show, Mr Sarwar said there were “three things that will fundamentally decide the Scottish Parliament election.”
He said: “One is whether people believe Scotland is going in the right direction under the SNP.
“Second, if they believe that we have an alternative plan to change direction for Scotland and deliver a more positive future.
“And third, of course, whether they believe a UK Labour Government is delivering for Scotland.
“And in all three of those, I think people have already decided that they can see that this is an incompetent SNP, that's lost its way.
“It's not the party it once was. We, over the course of the next 18 months, will be setting out what we would do differently if elected as a Scottish Labour government.
“And of course, this budget is a positive opportunity for us to show people the different approach we are now taking because we have a Labour government.
“We would not been able to end the era of austerity, deliver that vital new investment and prioritise economic growth if Scots hadn't chosen to get rid of a rotten Tory government, elect Scottish Labour MPs and elect a UK Labour government.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel