BP has reported a 30% decline in third quarter profit, its lowest in nearly four years, as it suffered from lower crude prices and weaker profit margins on its refining activities.
The oil supermajor posted underlying replacement cost profit, its preferred measure, of $2.3 billion for the three months from July to the end of September. This was better than the $2.1bn anticipated by analysts amid the slowdown in global economic activity and oil demand, particularly in China.
The results will nonetheless increase pressure on chief executive Murray Auchincloss, who took up the post in January with promises to focus on BP's high-margin businesses. This has raised concerns over the group's energy transition strategy which under former CEO Bernard Looney called for a rapid expansion into renewables and less oil output.
Read more:
Earlier this month it was reported that BP had abandoned a flagship target to cut oil and gas output by 2030. The company has also scaled back its low-carbon hydrogen investments and plans to sell its onshore wind operations in the US.
“We have made significant progress since we laid out our six priorities earlier this year to make bp simpler, more focused and higher value,” Mr Auchincloss said in a statement.
“In oil and gas, we see the potential to grow through the decade with a focus on value over volume. We also have a deep belief in the opportunity afforded by the energy transition – we have established a number of leading positions and will continue high-grading our investments to ensure they compete with the rest of our business.”
The results were BP's weakest since the fourth quarter of 2020 when the industry was hit by the Covid pandemic. The group reported a net profit of $2.8bn in the second quarter of this year, and $3.3bn in the third quarter of last year.
Shares in BP were trading more than 2% lower as of mid-day.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel