The Firth of Clyde is among the most intensely studied and hotly debated fisheries and marine ecosystems in Scotland. That’s why this week, The Herald’s latest series is taking a dive into the big questions around the state and future of its marine wildlife, fish populations and fishing industry.
In the Clyde we can find a microcosm of many of the issues affecting inshore fisheries and coastal marine protection. We also find an atmosphere fraught with tension over how to protect nature and preserve the already dwindling fishing industry.
To follow along, find every article in the series here.
Day One
How wild swimming made me take a dive into the future of Clyde fishing
Environmental reporter Vicky Allan went wild swimming in the Clyde, prompting big questions about how we protect both our fishing and fishermen.
'Things got aggressive and physical': How cod closure hit Clyde fishermen
Creel fishermen and trawlermen describe to Vicky Allan how the sudden closure of a fishery area drove some to leave the industry and put communities at war.
Hope for a Clyde cod supper? The battle to save a once common fish
Once common in the waters of the Clyde Sea, since the early 2000s, cod has been rare. Can recovery happen? And is the right effort being made?
A magnificent inland sea, Glasgow’s village pond: but is Firth of Clyde worth saving?
In 2014 Cabinet Secretary Richard Lochhead published his “Clyde 2020 Vision Statement”. That ‘Vision’ was for a healthy and thriving Firth of Clyde, the UK’s only inland sea with an area of 3000km2. 10 years on the Clyde 2020 programme has not generated one single measure to improve the Clyde and the Scottish Government has quietly withdrawn its support. Solicitor with Fish Legal Robert Younger comments.
Elaine Whyte: 'Everyone wants a sustainable future for the Clyde'
The Clyde is “unique” or a “microcosm of Scottish inshore fishing” are statements often used, except in reality it’s not, or it shouldn’t be, writes executive secretary of the Clyde Fishermen's Association Elaine Whyte.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article