Conservationists say that a planning application which would see a horse-trotting track carved into the site of the historic Bannockburn battlefield is “fundamentally flawed".
The National Trust for Scotland commissioned a report by landscape planning specialist which it says reveals serious deficiencies with the plans which have been submitted to Stirling Council.
The proposed trotting track, along with car parking, fencing and buildings, would be built in green fields next to the battlefield centre and parkland managed and cared for by the Trust.
It would be directly visible from the Rotunda which acts as a national monument to commemorate the 1314 battle, which changed the course of Scottish history and saw the English army of Edward II defeated by the Forces of Robert the Bruce.
The Trust’s report, prepared for the Trust by Glasgow-based expert Douglas Harman, has been submitted to the Scottish Government-appointed Reporter who is currently reviewing the application.
Stirling Council approved the application in July despite many objections and it was subsequently ‘called in’ by Scottish Ministers.
Visual Impact Assessment’ was submitted with the application, which it describes as a “fundamental omission”.
The report claims that no ‘Landscape andThe study also says that photos provided by the applicant to demonstrate how the facilities would appear once constructed “do not conform to relevant guidance” and were misleading, unreliable and “fundamentally flawed”.
The applicant’s assessment of landscape and visual impact was “not fit for purpose”, the survey says.
The charity also believes there are flaws in the council planning department’s handling of the application, including an “overreliance” on the information provided in the applicant’s submission.
Douglas Harman, of the Chartered Member of the Landscape Institute, said: “Given the large number of policy conflicts, there is no doubt that the proposed development is unacceptable in landscape and visual terms.
“In determining the application therefore, paramount importance should be afforded to the protection of this nationally important landscape.”
READ MORE:
- National Trust fights development proposal at Bannockburn site
- Ministers intervene and ‘call in’ plans to build on Bannockburn site
Stuart Brooks, the National Trust for Scotland’s Director of Conservation & Policy said: “The report supports our contention that this is the wrong application in the wrong place with the wrong decision by Stirling Council.
“It’s more than a matter of protecting green fields: they are the location of the first day’s combat at Bannockburn on 23 June 1314 and are not just historically and nationally significant but also form a core part of the setting and topography of the wider landscape that dictated the course of the battle.
“Many thousands of visitors each year come to the battlefield centre and the Rotunda to experience something of the fateful events that shaped our nation’s destiny.”
He added: “There is no doubt that the proposals, should they go ahead, would be wholly disruptive and compromise yet another part of the historic battlefield.
“It’s perhaps understandable why the applicant might want to play that down – but the Council’s assessment should have picked that up.
“We have respectfully submitted the report to the Scottish Reporter and we hope that it provides helpful information as part of the review of Stirling Council’s decision that is now underway.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel