This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
There is already controversy surrounding the SNP’s appointment of an interim chief executive.
Following the general election result, which saw the party lose 39 MPs, the party has looked to position itself with a view to the future – the 2026 Scottish Parliament and beyond.
It will be an important election for the SNP as they look to hold onto power in the Scottish Government.
But as the party faced backlash for its appointment of Carol Beattie as temporary replacement for former journalist Murray Foote, it suggests they may struggle to put the traumatic few years behind them.
Mr Foote resigned from the job on Friday, stating he could not make the “necessary personal commitment” to the delivery of change needed to get the party there.
It was expected Mr Foote would continue in post until a permanent successor was found. But around 24 hours later, the SNP announced Ms Beattie, a former Stirling Council chief executive, would take over on a temporary basis.
Read more from the Unspun newsletter:
Bank 'shredders' could learn from a small but mighty Highland firm
Analysis: Anger over Salmond's treatment will only intensify
Will Greens bring down Swinney or grovel to the SNP in budget vote?
A full recruitment is set to take place over the coming months, but Ms Beattie already has a wealth of experience in a similar role.
Ms Beattie was in the role from 2019, stepping down in May this year, later being selected as a local candidate in the Falkirk South by-election.
After being narrowly defeated in that council by election by Labour’s Claire Aitken, Ms Beattie was announced as interim chief executive just 24 hours later.
So why is the move controversial if Ms Beattie is highly experienced?
Questions have been raised on the sudden appointment and what would have happened if the SNP did win the Falkirk South by-election – would Mr Foote have stayed in the role until a successor was found?
However, the SNP have also received some criticism for the appointment because in September, Ms Beattie – at the time a local candidate – was forced to apologise for negative remarks she made about the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton.
It had emerged she previously responded to an article which described Ms Middleton, who at the time was undergoing cancer treatment, as demonstrating that the “show goes on” in her return to public appearances.
The news article said “lesser mortals would have stayed at home”.
But Ms Beattie responded that “intelligent people don’t support the monarchy”, adding that those who do “use them as symbols of their bigotry or xenophobic values”.
Get Scotland's top politics newsletter straight to your inbox
And upon facing backlash, she said: "I apologise for any offence caused by the language I have used and have removed the tweets."
The controversy wasn’t addressed by the SNP, with party depute Keith Brown stating Ms Beattie would ensure the party continued to be a “dynamic election winning organisation”.
Ms Beattie is clearly a highly experienced chief executive. But her appointment will not have gone to plan for the SNP and it is certainly a setback in their push to reset after the general election.
And as it looks to bounce back from a tough few years, which has saw three leaders in two years, getting a permanent appointment right could be crucial.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel