The developers behind plans for student flats on the former Admiral pub site in Glasgow have launched an appeal due to the time taken by the council to make a decision.
A bid to knock down properties on Waterloo Street, including the popular bar, and put up a 19-storey student accommodation block was submitted in May.
It would see the B-listed Distillers’ building — next to The Admiral — incorporated into the wider development, which would include 350 student beds, a cinema, sports hall, podcast studios and a karaoke room.
Varsity Developments, the firm behind the project, has appealed to the Scottish Government as it says no feedback has been received.
It states the application is classified as “major” and therefore has “a statutory determination period of four months”. The application was declared valid on May 3.
“Glasgow City Council has failed to determine the application within the relevant statutory timescales,” the company adds. The appeal has been submitted in “light of the fact there has been no meaningful feedback or engagement on the application… and they have provided no indication as to when the application may be determined”.
READ MORE: Well-loved Glasgow bar forced to close doors after 60 years
Talks with the council over the student flats plan began in early 2023, the appeal states. The project would see 70 and 72A Waterloo Street knocked down and partial demolition to the rear warehouse part of 64 Waterloo Street (the Distillers’ building), but would retain the front section.
Varsity Developments, part of the Locate Developments Group, took ownership of the site in March 2022 and has partnered with Aparto, which would manage the flats. There is currently outstanding planning permission for demolition of the properties, repairs to the front of the listed building and creation of office space.
Historic Environment Scotland has said it would prefer a more conservation-led approach to the site but the current proposals are “more sympathetic” to the listed building than the consented scheme.
The developers say they have committed to further reinstatement works suggested in the heritage body’s letter. They also argue the proposed development is “consistent with the parameters established” in the existing permission.
They add an assessment found “clear and unequivocal demand for additional student accommodation” in Glasgow and the proposal would secure the “long-term future” of the Distillers’ building through “retention of its most significant parts”.
Glasgow Chamber of Commerce has backed the proposal, with chief executive Stuart Patrick saying it addresses a “pressing need” for student accommodation.
He added the plan has “the ability to revitalise a long-term vacant city centre site, which has no prospect of continuing in office use” and will “create activity and expenditure in the area”.
Varsity Developments claims there is “no material consideration” to indicate that planning permission should not be granted and has urged an independent reporter, appointed by the Scottish Government, to allow the appeal.
The reporter has requested a response from the council and is expected to make a decision by late November. A spokesman for the council said they were unable to comment on a live appeal.
The Admiral shut down in March last year due to the redevelopment plans, with bosses moving to a new venue, previously The Woods, on the corner of Waterloo Street and Wellington Street. It is known as The Admiral Woods.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here