Back in July 2022, when he was still Scotland's health secretary, Humza Yousaf pledged to "eradicate" the longest waits for NHS treatment.
By the end of September 2022, there was supposed to be virtually no one left on inpatient and day case lists who had been waiting over over two years for their procedure.
Waits in excess of one year were supposed to be gone by the end of September 2024.
Neither of these targets has come close to being achieved, even with the £300 million waiting list fund unveiled exactly a year ago.
EXC: One year on, just £30m of £300m wait list fund given to NHS
One of the obstacles has been delays to National Treatment Centres (NTCs) - the standalone elective hubs dedicated to carrying out planned procedures.
One of the first NTCs to open - the Highland NTC in Inverness - carried out 635 planned operations in August this year, exceeding the 457 performed at Raigmore Hospital, the region's main acute centre.
READ MORE:
- Just £30m of £300m waiting list fund spent as health boards struggle to cut backlogs
- Did Programme for Government hold any answers for health and social care?
- NHS Scotland: What's happening to cancer waiting times?
- Rural versus urban: The other side of 'two tier' healthcare in Scotland
Overall, the number of planned procedures completed by NHS Highland was up by 31% year-on-year.
This demonstrates just how big a difference it can make to productivity when elective work is separated from acute sites, where planned operations can be cancelled to make way for emergency surgeries or where beds 'blocked' as a result of elderly patients waiting for social care mean there is no space for a new inpatient admission.
Notably, Scotland's two largest health boards - NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Lothian, neither of which has an NTC - actually completed fewer planned operations in August this year than last year, down by 7.3% and 12% respectively.
Half the of 10 NTCs planned are currently on hold due to a squeeze on capital expenditure.
So how has NHS England slashed its backlogs?
The number of two year waits has gone from a peak of 24,424 in January 2022 to just 124 by August this year, versus 7,146 in Scotland by the end of June.
NHS England refers more patients to private hospitals to speed up treatment - an option used comparatively rarely in Scotland.
Ken Hay, Scotland chair for the Independent Healthcare Provider Network (IHPN) - which represents the private sector - said its members "stand ready and able to support the Scottish Government in their efforts to reduce the backlog in NHS care, and are open to providing much needed outpatient, diagnostic and surgical services, free at the point of use for patients".
But England has also made benefitted 108 NHS surgical hubs, 90 of which have been created since the pandemic.
Some are standalone elective units - similar to the NTC model - but most are either "integrated hubs" (based within existing hospitals but physically segregated from acute areas) or "ring-fenced hubs" (theatre space and beds are set aside for their use).
In all cases, these hubs exclusively perform planned surgery, have their own pool of staff, and operate six days a week - or are working towards it.
Trusts are incentivised to ramp up activity in return for financial rewards.
Earlier this year, a report by the Health Foundation think tank found that the newly opened hubs were associated with a 22% increase in the number of "high volume low complexity" surgeries that trusts were able to carry out.
If the Scottish Government is serious about clearing the backlogs, it needs to come up with new ways to boost capacity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel