Just three weeks ago Alex Salmond was in Holyrood’s public gallery, watching as the King paid tribute to the Scottish Parliament's first 25 years.
The former first minister cut a lonely figure. His two living predecessors didn’t turn up and his three successors, all MSPs, were on the floor of the chamber.
He was squeezed behind some quango bosses.
I looked at him from my seat in the press gallery on the other side of the debating chamber he had dominated for years and wondered what was going through his head.
For all his faults, he was one of the most significant Scottish politicians of my lifetime, of the parliament’s lifetime.
But there he was, in the corner, far away from the action. It would be unfair to call him diminished, but while the other elder statesmen of devolution were given their due on the day, he was sidelined.
READ MORE
- Alex Salmond dead aged 69 as former SNP leader passes away
- Sturgeon pays tribute to Alex Salmond following sudden death
- Alex Salmond: Flags lowered as allies reveal 'heartbreak'
I first interviewed Alex Salmond in 1998. I was 16 and writing for Quartet, the Mintlaw Academy school newspaper. He was our local MP and I and my fellow child reporter, Fiona, were absolutely terrified.
We needn’t have been. He almost certainly had better things to do, but he was generous with his time, patient with our basic questions and forgiving of our inexperience.
I interviewed him many times over the years, most recently in May. He was often less patient and forgiving, and if you asked a question he didn’t like, less generous with his time.
But what shone through in every single interview, was the passion for his cause.
It was a passion that helped take Scottish independence from a niche concern - even in the SNP heartland of Banff and Buchan where I grew up - to the opinion of roughly one in two Scots.
It was a passion though that could often turn to anger.
It wasn’t that he didn’t suffer fools gladly, but colleagues, civil servants, party staff, and anyone who underperformed, underprepared or wasn’t at the very top of their game would feel the brunt of his temper.
When he left office after falling short of winning the referendum, he was still a relatively young man.
If he’d been in Labour or the Tories they would have put him in the Lords and kept him busy.
Instead, he ended up being a talk show host for the Kremlin-backed TV station, RT.
He was genuinely proud of the show and the work he did and insisted that he had never been asked to alter his editorial line.
His position with the channel became untenable after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Mr Salmond's final years will be remembered for the sexual misconduct allegations, the Scottish Government’s unlawful investigation, and a later trial in which he was acquitted of all charges.
It was unfinished business, as far as he was concerned.
He was taking the SNP government to court, alleging "malfeasance" by various former and current officials who he argued had "conducted themselves improperly, in bad faith and beyond their powers.”
That wasn't his only unfinished business. Just moments before he died, Mr Salmond was on X criticising John Swinney for taking part in Friday's meeting of the Council of Nations and Regions.
He said the meeting of devolved leaders and metro mayors organised by Sir Keir Starmer was "designed to diminish the status of our Parliament and the First Minister."
"Part of becoming independent is about thinking independently, not subserviently.
"Scotland is a country, not a county," he added.
What will happen to Alex Salmond's unfinished business now?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article