Scotland is at the forefront of a new energy storage revolution led by hydropower but some communities have raised concerns over the potential cost of net zero progress.
Sometimes the dimensions of £1 billion hydro plants have raised concerns, while safety issues around other energy storage forms such as lithium battery parks have also been voiced.
There is also a further concern around the ethical sourcing of materials such as lithium, highlighted by Friends of the Earth Scotland.
However, proponents of the new technologies insist they are safe, and that where there have been community concerns, they have worked to address those issues.
Campaigners who have opposed one lithium battery park proposed by York-based Apatura, Save Our Countryside – Cochno Road, near Clydebank pointed to fire risk concerns, saying: “Lithium-ion batteries can overheat, leading to fires or explosions. These incidents can be difficult to control and may release toxic fumes, posing a risk to nearby residents.”
Apatura said that “each battery container will have a fire detection and suppression system and would be continually monitored by a battery management system, which would report any faults”.
Energy storage is seen as important enough for the UK Government to announce this week that it is to underwrite the risk of long-duration energy storage sites such as hydro facilities.
READ THE WHOLE SERIES HERE:
- Part One: Scotland powers towards new hydro energy revolution
- Part Two: Entrepreneur is ‘overnight millionaire’ as he sells power plant plan to energy giant
- All you need to know about the new hydro energy revolution
- European energy giant hails Scottish hydro 'renaissance'
- Questions raised over Scotland's new energy storage farms
Mark Wilson, chief executive of Intelligent Land Investments, which is helping spearhead the new hydro revolution, told The Herald: “We need roughly 60 gigawatts of energy storage to balance the grid to get us all to net zero. The stats that I’ve seen, we are looking at anywhere between 10 and 20 gigawatts of pumped storage, but other people may correct me, that’s my understanding, and the rest is going to be a combination of lithium battery, probably some green hydrogen and probably some compressed air and flow batteries, and other technologies as they are proven, but they would be the main candidates that we would see.
“We do a lot of community meetings, so before we put a site into planning we will do a community meeting to explain it all to people.”
He continued: “The backlash on batteries, there has been a bit of press about it, and some people think it is potentially a hazard but it is the exact same battery that is in your mobile phone.
“To do a 50 megawatt battery project it would cost about £20 million. So the cooling systems in there and safety systems are in there to keep that technology safe. From a business point of view, it is second to none.”
He said: “It is not something they should be scared of, it is something they should be embracing, it is going to get us to net zero, it is going to be good for country, get us off gas and bring our energy bills down, it is only positive.
“We are a green energy company, and we believe a very ethical energy company, and we wouldn’t be doing it if we thought it was wrong."
Communication is key
ILI sold the consented plans for Red John, now called Loch na Cathrach, to Norwegian giant Statkraft, and Mr Wilson added that the scale of the projects is also a boost for communities.
He said: “We bring the community along with us and the key is communication. If we’ve got a single person that has got a concern we will go out and see them.
“When we were doing Red John, there were concerns about the upper headpond, the height of that. We changed the whole physicality of it to address the concerns of the local people.
“People recognised Red John was going to cost £800 million to a £1 billion to build, £600m of that is going to be injected into the community. There will be 450 direct workers building that project, we anticipated.”
Iain Robertson, head of Statkraft Scotland, also said interacting with the community is important: “Statkraft has a good neighbour ethos, and within weeks of acquiring the project almost a year ago we were meeting face to face with community representatives and organising exhibitions to introduce ourselves.
“One of the first things we did on acquiring the scheme was to hold an extremely well-attended event at the Inverness Townhouse, where it was made clear that we want to see our investment stay in the regional economy. Construction possibilities were highlighted, resulting in discussions with suppliers and other stakeholders which we hope to talk more about soon.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel