It is a candidate for the largest bug to have ever lived – a nine-foot long millipede which scuttled across the land that would one day become Scotland.
But despite finding traces of the creature’s shell, and the marks its spiny legs left behind, scientists have never been able to work out what the jumbo creep-crawly looked like.
Now a chance discovery in France of two fossils have finally revealed what the creature’s face looked like.
And the find has given clues on whether the many-legged monster may have snacked on meat or plants.
Called Arthropleura, the giant arthropod lived in the carboniferous forests of the ancient world, 300 million years ago.
Measuring a foot across, and growing almost ten feet in length, the extinct animal had up to 64 legs and its thought to be an ancestor to today’s slaters, millipedes and centipedes.
Apart from its footprints, examples of which can be found on rocks in Fife and on Arran today, only the fossilised remains of its molted carapace, without a head, have been found.
However, thanks to the latest discovery, scientists have produced a mug shot after studying fossils of juveniles that were complete and very well preserved
The giant bug’s head was revealed to be a round ‘bulb’ with two short bell-shaped antennae jutting from the front of its ‘face’,
Surprisingly, the creatures eyes two protruded on stalks like a crab, raising questions about whether it could take to the water as well as the land.
Its mouth was small, and adapted for grinding leaves and bark leading researchers to decide that Arthropleura ate rotting leaves and bark on the ancient, swampy, forest floor, according to the research published in Science Advances.
The creatures were arthropods -- the group that today includes crabs, spiders and insects – with features of modern-day centipedes and millipedes.
“We discovered that it had the body of a millipede, but head of a centipede,” said study co-author and paleobiologist Mickael Lheritier at the University Claude Bernard Lyon in Villeurbanne, France.
The largest Arthropleura may have been the biggest bugs to ever live, although there is still a debate. They may be a close second to an extinct giant sea scorpion.
Researchers in Europe and North America have been collecting fragments and footprints of the huge bugs since the late 1800s.
“We have been wanting to see what the head of this animal looked like for a really long time,” said James Lamsdell, a paleobiologist at West Virginia University, who was not involved in the study.
To produce a model of the head, researchers first used CT scans to study fossil specimens of fully intact juveniles embedded in rocks found in a French coal field in the 1980s.
READ MORE:
- Ancient shrimp named ‘weegie’ in honour of Glasgow origins
- Skye fossils show Jurassic mammals lived longer and grew more slowly
This technique allowed the researchers to scrutinize “hidden details like bits of the head that are still embedded in the rock” without marring the fossil, Lamsdell said.
“When you chip away at rock, you don’t know what part of a delicate fossil may have been lost or damaged,” he said.
The juvenile fossil specimens only measured about 2 inches (6 centimeters) and it’s possible they were a type of Arthropleura that didn’t grow to enormous sizes.
But even if so, the researchers said they are close enough kin to provide a glimpse of what adults looked like when they were alive 300 million years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here