Retail bosses have urged Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to slash the tax burden on the industry as the Budget on October 30 nears.
The chief executives of more than 70 retail firms have called on Ms Reeves level to “level the playing field between industries”, amid claims the sector pays proportionally more in taxes than others.
In a letter co-ordinated by the British Retail Consortium (BRC), the signatories make the case for the UK Government to introduce a Retail Rates Corrector as part of its commitment to reform the business rates system.
Read more:
- Former 63rd + 1st in Glasgow have reverted to landlord
- Turn old Glasgow offices into homes, property veterans say
-
'It’s clear that Harper Macleod is an employer of choice'
The BRC says the corrector – a 20% downward adjustment in business rates paid on retail properties - would redress the “imbalance” that sees the retail industry pay 7.4% of all business taxes (£33 billion), a share one and a half times greater than its share of the overall economy (5% of GDP). The tax burden holds back investment in people and places, directly affecting the 3 million people employed by the industry, and the 2.7 million further people employed within the supply chain, the organisation said.
The call for action comes as the BRC says the UK has been losing shops at a rate of over 1,000 a year, with research suggesting that without action a further 17,000 shops could close over the next decade. The BRC says the Retail Rates Corrector could stem the tide of shop closures, and unlock new investment in jobs, shops and communities.
Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, said: “Retail has been the golden goose, generating tax revenues far beyond the industry’s size, but the current situation is not sustainable. The government should act to rebalance the system and ensure all industries are paying their fair share. This in turn would drive increased retail investment in people, places and communities.
“The Budget is the perfect opportunity to lay the groundwork for local investment that delivers for retail’s customers, delivers for its employees, and delivers for the economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here