Humza Yousaf is back in the news again after questions were raised about whether he secured preferential treatment from the UK Government in helping his parents-in-law flee war-torn Gaza.
The Former First Minister has issued a furious denial he was involved, branding the allegations “smears”, while John Swinney has said there will not be any Scottish Government investigation into the claims.
The allegations surfaced at the weekend, with reports that Mr Yousaf lobbied the UK Government to help his wife’s parents escape from the territory when it came under attack from Israel following the October 7 massacres.
Senior Tory MSP Stephen Kerr has called for a probe into the claims.
What’s the background to this story?
After Israel shut its border with Gaza and began its military action, the parents of Humza Yousaf’s wife Nadia - Elizabeth and Maged El-Nakla – became trapped.
The couple had been visiting relatives in the Strip, but were unable to leave and were witness to the daily bombardment of civilian zones which accompanied the Israeli offensive.
After several weeks, both were able to cross the border with Egypt and return home to Scotland.
What has been alleged about Humza Yousaf’s role?
The Sunday Telegraph newspaper reported it has obtained a cache of correspondence which reveals the extent to which members of Mr Yousaf’s private office assisted him in lobbying for his relatives’ release.
The newspaper claimed these efforts resulted in Mr Yousaf securing an “urgent” call with Lord Ahmed, the then Middle East minister, on Oct 10 “to discuss the ongoing situation in Israel/Gaza, specifically with regards to his parents-in-law”.
Speaking to newspaper, Stephen Kerr, who served on the Scottish Parliament’s Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee until earlier this year, said, while Mr Yousaf’s “motives” should not be questioned, “we have every right to question his methods”.
They can try all the smears they want, but they won't stop me from talking about the atrocities facing the people of Gaza & Lebanon.
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) September 30, 2024
As the FOIs show, not a single request was ever made by me for preferential treatment for my in-laws. They left alongside other British nationals. https://t.co/Lvcj9GdM1e pic.twitter.com/VRV3QdCgLs
How has Humza Yousaf responded?
Angrily. The Former First Minister took to Twitter to say: “They can try all the smears they want, but they won't stop me from talking about the atrocities facing the people of Gaza & Lebanon.
“As the FOIs show, not a single request was ever made by me for preferential treatment for my in-laws. They left alongside other British nationals.”
READ MORE:
- Alex Salmond slams Yousaf as 'Humza the Brief, a footnote in SNP history'
- John Swinney fears 'more dangerous' Middle East conflict
- Humza Yousaf says relatives 'forced to flee homes in Gaza Strip'
First Minister John Swinney has backed his colleague, saying: “I think what’s important is to focus on the central point in this whole story, which is about the fact that we had citizens from this country who were trapped in Gaza, in an awful conflict and they had to be supported to be brought home,” he said.
Asked specifically if he would order a probe under the ministerial code, Mr Swinney said: “I have no intention of doing so.”
And the official response?
An FCDO spokesman told the Sunday Telegraph: “No preferential treatment was given to the former first minister or his family. FCDO Ministers spoke with him at the time to update him on the conflict in the Middle East. As part of these wider conversations, they discussed his family’s personal circumstances”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel