This article appears as part of the Unspun: Scottish Politics newsletter.
In June, ahead of the General Election, the Daily Record had a story about how a new Labour government would see the Scotland Office taking responsibility for handing out Levelling Up money.
The headline on the paper’s splash was Labour pledges £150m to fight Scots poverty.
The report said the party wanted to turn Mr Murray’s department “into a proper spending department with financial clout.”
And that to do this “over £150m will be given directly to the Scotland Office to dole out north of the border.”
READ MORE: What do Tory MSPs really think about Douglas Ross?
Now to be fair to Mr Murray, that number never escaped his lips. He was never quoted directly saying that he’d be spending £150m.
However, he didn’t exactly shut it down either.
In fact, he, Anas Sarwar, and the Scottish Labour official social media accounts all shared the front page of the Record.
Senior Labour figures retweeted stories from other papers that followed up on the story.
And yet, last week, when he was asked about it on the BBC’s Sunday Show, Mr Murray said that figure was “made up” by a journalist.
READ MORE: Ian Murray: Labour doesn't have £150 million ‘war chest’ for Scotland
So where did the £150m come from and exactly how much “financial clout” will the new Scottish Secretary have?
One of the reasons this row has really taken hold is that the UK Government’s decision to scrap the universal winter fuel payment saw the Scottish Government lose pretty much the exact same amount in consequentials.
That, SNP ministers say, is why they had no choice but to follow suit and target the winter fuel payment up here.
What we do know is that Labour’s manifesto committed the party to “restore decision-making over the allocation of structural funds to the representatives of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.”
They have to wait until the budget at the end of next month and then there will be legislation tabled in Parliament which will allow the Scotland Office to become a spending department.
Under the Tories, this cash was Levelling Up money, paid directly by the UK government to local communities.
The last round of funding handed out saw ten projects in Scotland given a total of £177m.
When I asked Mr Murray about it all at Labour conference, he told me: “It's not our figure. I think it's one of your journalistic colleague’s figures who's been digging around to see what's been spent in the past. So that's clearly what it is.”.
Get Scotland's top politics newsletter straight to your inbox.
So how much will he actually have?
There will, Mr Murray added last week, be money, but there is a process to go through first.
When he does have cash to spend, he will spend it on his “four priorities’ which are growth, green, brand and poverty.
There are two problems here, first of all the Scottish Government will see this as disrespectful to devolution. They will argue that as the government responsible for devolved areas they should be responsible for how cash is spent in areas.
That’s a political problem and one that Labour won't shy away from arguing.
READ MORE: Fears grow over £15m Drumchapel regeneration funding
The second — and I’d argue more difficult — problem for Mr Murray is over the promises made by the last government.
Over the weekend, The Herald reported that around £15m in Levelling Up funding awarded to Glasgow City Council last November for the regeneration of Drumchapel was now under review as ministers try to find ways to plug a £22bn black hole in the public finances.
Other Levelling Up projects across Scotland have been told similar.
Can Ian Murray really hand out cash to some communities while taking away cash already promised to others?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here