An academic who lost her employment tribunal fight against the University of Glasgow after claiming she was "passed over" for promotion will have her appeal heard by a judge in the New Year.
Professor Jeanette Findlay, who is president of UCU Scotland, lost her sex discrimination fight against her employer but the institution was urged to review its procedures for helping staff progress in their careers.
She claimed her application to be made a Professor of Economics was rejected by the university on account of her gender.
However, an employment judge agreed with the university, that the 63-year-old's application was turned down in 2020 because she did not meet the promotion criteria and it was "unconnected to her sex".
A full appeal hearing will now take place on January 25.
While the panel rejected her claim of sex discrimination at an employment tribunal held last August, the university was advised by them to review its mentoring, career development and academic promotion policies.
The tribunal was told that as of January 2020, there had never been a woman promoted to a Chair in Economics at Glasgow University in the entire history of the university from its foundation in 1451.
Professor Sir Anton Muscatelli said during the hearing that it was “shameful” so few women were promoted to senior roles and the university has set a target to achieve a 50/50 gender split.
The university announced today that it has appointed its 51st principal and vice-chancellor as it approaches its 575th anniversary.
Professor Andy Schofield will take up the role in autumn 2025, taking over from Prof Muscatelli who has held the post for 15 years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel