Waiting times for cancer care have improved, but the NHS is still missing a key target, new figures show.
Cancer treatment waiting times are judged against two standards; that 95% of patients should begin treatment within 62 days of an urgent referral, and the same proportion wait no longer than 31 days from the decision to treat.
Between April 1 and June 30 of this year, new figures released by Public Health Scotland show the 31-day standard was met for the first time since the same period last year, with 95.5% receiving treatment in the target time, up from 94.1% the previous quarter.
But while the 62-day standard improved slightly, the 73.2% of patients receiving treatment within the target time remained well below the aim of the Scottish Government.
Read More:
-
People with heart conditions 'missing out' on support to get them physically active
-
Warning of ‘significant’ fines for anyone breaking abortion buffer zone laws
-
'They kept me sane': Spina bifida patient 'on the breadline' until charity stepped in
The figure increased from 70.5% the previous quarter.
Health Secretary Neil Gray welcomed the improvement, but recognised more was needed.
“It is positive that we have met the 31-day standard, ensuring that patients receive prompt treatment when they need it most.
“This is a testament to the hard work of our NHS staff, who continue to deliver high-quality care under increasing pressure.
“However, we recognise that more needs to be done to improve performance against the 62-day standard, particularly in high-volume cancer pathways like urology and colorectal.
“We are tackling these challenges head-on by investing in our cancer services and working with NHS boards to drive improvements.”
He added: “We’re treating more patients with cancer on time within both standards compared to 10 years ago.
“Despite this, there will always be instances where some patients wait longer depending on their health, complexity of disease and agreed treatment plan.”
But one of the country’s leading cancer charities urged the Government to take action to improve waiting times.
Dr Sorcha Hume, the public affairs manager for Scotland at Cancer Research UK, said issues were caused by “years of chronic workforce shortages and a lack of specialist equipment”.
“It’s an unacceptable situation for patients left worrying that they have a disease that could progress if left untreated,” she added.
“It’s crucial the Scottish Government takes urgent action with the implementation of its cancer strategy.
“Steps must be taken to ensure services are fit for now and the future.”
Scottish Tory health spokesman Dr Sandesh Gulhane said: “Cutting cancer waiting times should be Neil Gray’s top priority.
“He should start by adopting our bold plans to speed up the delivery of early cancer diagnostic centres.”
Scottish Labour’s health spokeswoman Dame Jackie Baillie said: “Early diagnosis and treatment is crucial so it is nothing short of a national scandal that the SNP has not met its 62-day cancer treatment standard in over a decade.
“Fantastic NHS staff are working tirelessly to deliver the standard of treatment patients deserve, but long waits are putting lives on the line.”
Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton urged Mr Gray to “wake up to the crisis in our NHS”.
“He may be content to bury his head in the sand but that is not good enough for the thousands of patients being failed by this Government’s mismanagement of our health service,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here