If you’re looking for insight into the challenges facing universities at an international level, Dr Fernando León-García's office is a good place to start.
As president of CETYS University in Mexico since 2011, he led the institution to accreditation in the USA and to one of the highest internationalisation rates in Mexico.
He is also the current president of the International Association of University Principals (IAUP), a role he took on in 2021, and from which he is now preparing to step down at the end of his three-year term.
Coping with, and learning from, the pandemic
Our first topic of conversation is, sadly, the most obvious starting point: the impact of, and recovery from, the ravages of the Covid pandemic.
Dr León-García tells me that while very few institutions around the world were prepared for that sort of upheaval, the sector generally “shifted very quickly” and found “not the perfect solution – but a solution.”
“What we found out was that those that had already been experimenting or had positioned their universities to engage in technology-mediated or some form of distance learning - they didn't struggle because the eco-system, the environment, was there already.
Other universities faced greater challenges, principally because staff had to be trained and supported to “make sure that the type of learning that was going to occur was appropriate and that it was robust.”
And all of this was made even more difficult by not knowing how long the crisis would continue.
But there were benefits, especially the fact that “most institutions” started to consider how far their teaching approaches could accommodate all learners. The question that was posed, and which continues to challenge the sector, was whether the “predominant model of face-to-face for all” is “the best we can do”.
Supporting students to succeed
One consequence of that shift has, I’m told, been a far greater focus on supporting those studying at university. This has manifested as an “intensification of attention on student development and student support” in the form of mental health work, mentoring, and the development of personal skills alongside the continuing focus on academic progress.
Even leading universities, Dr León-García says, are increasingly talking about the “need to move from an outdated and outmoded understanding of what their role is.” Traditionally, university-level education has been viewed through the lens of “selectivity”, where the focus is on only admitting those who can easily progress through their chosen programmes, while rejecting large numbers of applicants. Indeed, much of the university model is based on this premise.
“But selectivity means exclusion and we're in an age where we're trying to promote the opposite - inclusion. So, how is it that you can offer high quality but yet be more inclusive?
“It requires a discussion, and a possible adjustment in terms of the mindset, of the most prestigious lead institutions as well as the core of Higher Education.
“It's less about who you reject and more who you accept and how you help them based on the point in their development where they came in.”
The impact of internationalisation
Another of the key questions about universities concerns the “internationalisation” of the higher education sector. In countries like Scotland, we often think of this exclusively in terms of attracting foreign – and, crucially, fee-paying – students, something that Dr León-García says “offsets the costs of domestic students in many cases.”
In Mexico, for example, where internationalisation has generally focused on student exchange programmes, policymakers are now asking whether the country’s “quality institutions” could capitalise on the “very desirable environment for tourists” and attract paying students into the country.
Dr León-García also highlights Japan and Korea, where bringing in foreign students is seen as a possible route to protecting institutions in the face of falling domestic populations, contrasting them with Australia and Canada, which have been hugely successful in attracting people from other countries but are now seeking to limit the numbers.
But he is also keen to stress that this internationalisation takes different forms. During the pandemic, the global south was “suffering” as a result of not being able to send students abroad, but this has opened up opportunities for connecting with others through technology in a way that wasn’t the priority beforehand.
“So you had internationalization without physical mobility during Covid,” he says.
“And one of the things that has happened is that after Covid, in the post-pandemic era, there is a greater acceptance to say: well we can't send the students, they can't have a direct experience, but at least we're interacting and socialising and we are getting some experiences that are developing a global and diverse perspective without having to go abroad.
“And at the same time you're having access, or increasing access, to faculty that weren't available before. And there's a greater acceptance of saying that while he or she, some great professor, can't come here, we can connect and we can have this interaction.”
University finances
In Scotland, the issue of internationalisation is closely tied to that of university funding - but we are far from unique in grappling with this particular problem.
Dr León-García explains that in countries where public funding has been the key income source for universities, “you are seeing a diminishing percent of the budget coming from government.” This shift raises questions not just about financing itself, but also the broader financial viability of institutions, and has pushed countries like Germany, which has “typically not charged anything”, to introduce some form of fees.
In other countries, however, a major part of the debate concerns the balance between public and private institutions. In Brazil, for example, more than two thirds of university enrolments are in private universities which receive “marginal funding and quality requirements from the government”, but the bulk of public financial support is centred on the development of “elite public higher education”.
Read more:
Find articles – Scottish universities: funding, fees and the future
Investigation suggests extent of ScotGov university funding shortage
Mapped: University tuitions fees across the UK and Europe
Across the continent in Chile a “high percent” of the population wishes to pursue university education, and the country regards this as “pivotal” for its development, which has resulted in a different approach where private universities receive greater public support but as also subject for more stringent requirements around the students they accept.
Ultimately, this is a matter of national priorities, and Dr León-García argues that in countries that regard higher education as “a major contributor to the development and well-being of the country” there will be a greater willingness to fund it generously.
What does the future hold?
There is, it seems, no shortage of challenges facing universities in the coming years: the emergence of AI; the balance between face-to-face and online learning; finances, including government funding and the role of recruiting fee-paying students.
Even the physical footprint of universities is up for debate, and Dr León-García believes that “undeniably the campus environment as we know it is going to change,” with a shift away from “fully residential” campuses.
But he argues that the biggest change has to be “a matter of mindset”, and that progress would mean “not going back entirely to what we were doing, but examining what worked in the past that does merit to be continued and what it is we were not doing in the past that we must now try to incorporate.”
What’s more, he says that we must “leave in the past” the things that we now find to be “irrelevant” in order to realise a brighter future.
All of this must be done, however, while being “mindful of the mission”, which means that institutions must ask who they were established to serve, and how they can best achieve that goal. The answers to these questions will be different from one university to the next, and that diversity should be embraced rather than dismissed.
“You have to look at the long-term financial and operational sustainability,” he says, “and you have to try to remain relevant to the society we serve.”
“And in the process, we have to look at some key aspects: cultural awareness and understanding, inclusion, digital transformation, social responsibilities, and the notion that you can't go it alone.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel