The former chief executive of Scotland’s water regulator received six months’ pay after it was deemed lavish spending at the body did not represent “gross misconduct”, MSPs have been told.
That's despite the Water Industry Commission for Scotland insisting there has now been a change in culture at the organisation since Alan Sutherland's resignation in December last year.
Ministers conducting a review into Scotland’s water industry regulator quizzed the board over training spend worth over half a million along with trips to places such as America and Argentina.
The committee took evidence from Michelle Quinn, the Interim Director-General Net Zero, Kersti Berge, Director of Energy & Climate Change, and Catherine Williams, Interim Director of Water Policy for the Scottish Government as well as David Satti, interim Chief Executive, Donald MacRae, chair of the board, and Robin McGill, Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee for Water Industry Commission for Scotland (WICS).
Public spending watchdog Audit Scotland had been critical over failing to seek Scottish Government approval for spending in advance.
Former chief executive Mr Sutherland resigned hours after the report was published.
Spending included a 13-day Transatlantic executive development programme course costing £20,404 as well as £84,620 spent on an executive Master of Business Administration course over two years for a head of retail which included time spent in London and a five-day assignment in Argentina with travel and accommodation costing £10,856.
A similar two year course for another senior manager from January, 2017, involving an assignment in Argentina cost £72,795 including £11,713 travel and accommodation expenses.
Read More:
-
Ministers launch probe of Scots finance regulator after £500k staff training row
-
Colossal: Scandal-hit Scots finance regulator spent £500k on unapproved training
-
ScotGov 'sanctioned' shamed financial watchdog chief's £90k payoff
And some £87,769 was spent on 40 days of executive coaching for the senior management and executive team over five years at the Stirling office.
They were quizzed by MSPs Richard Leonard, James Dornan, Jamie Greene, Graham Simpson and Colin Beattie about these costs.
An opening statement from Mr Macrae admitted that “WICS needs to accept the need for a greater focus on value for money and the need to operate to the highest standard of financial management".
He later stated that they were trying to instil a change in culture but their costs were criticised throughout the two hour long committee meeting.
Mr Simpson MSP was particularly scathing as he branded social media training ‘laughable and rubbish’ as he criticised their output on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook and LinkedIn despite spending a hefty amount on a course.
Their use of corporate credit cards for flights was criticised although Mr Satti did confirm that they were no longer in use apart from one kept for IT purchases.
Prior to that, it had been used to book flights to Rwanda and Brazil.
The WICS board was keen to reiterate throughout the questioning that they had been changing their culture as well as their protocol for how expenses are dealt with.
But Mr Macrae said: "There was no gross misconduct.
“You could have dismissal without gross misconduct, but that would have meant payment of 12 months’ salary, which would have been considerably more than what we actually agreed, so that’s why that option, in value for money terms, was twice as expensive as the one that we chose.”
Mr MacRae insisted a previous senior Scottish Government official had cleared the payment, claiming he said “we can do this” in a phone call.
But acting Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin told MSPs in the Holyrood chamber later on Wednesday that the Scottish Government was only made aware of the payment on January 12 – weeks after Mr Sutherland had stepped down.
The interim director-general for net zero in the Scottish Government, Michelle Quinn, speaking in the same committee hearing, added that Wics had sought “retrospective” agreement for the payment to Ms Sutherland.
But Mr MacRae said “we, and I, followed the process”, adding: “I believe that we acted in the best interests of everybody and achieved a result which proved best value for money and have evidence that we received approval from the deputy director on December 19 and 20.”
The Scottish Government is currently undertaking a review of Wics, but has not announced a date for the report to be released.
A further part of the hearing was then head in private with Stephen Boyle, Auditor General for Scotland, Carole Grant, Audit Director, Richard Smith, Senior Audit Manager, and Lauryn Graham, Senior Auditor, Audit Scotland all providing evidence to the committee.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel